Friday, September 21, 2018

The Scary and Dark History of Clowns


The Ancient (and Dark) History of the Clown by Andrew Halliday 1863

For a list of all of my digital books and books on disks click here

It is very possible that pantomimic (Clown) performances were practised at feasts or merry-makings among the Jews and ancient Egyptians, and we know that the early Greek drama largely partook of the nature of pantomime; but pantomime as a regularly organized theatrical entertainment was first introduced at Rome in the reign of Augustus. Indeed, that exalted personage is said to have been the inventor of it. It is certain, at any rate, that he patronized it most liberally, and that splendid pantomimes were produced in Rome during his reign. Maecenas, Virgil, Horace, Ovid, and most of the literary men of the day, frequented the theatres to witness them; and in some of their works we have criticisms of the pieces and of the actors who performed in them. There were two great rival pantomimists at this time in Rome, Bathyllus and Pylades. The former was originally a slave in the household of Maecenas; but his master was so delighted with the way in which he used to amuse his guests with mimicry and other antics at table that he gave him his liberty, and procured him an engagement at the theatre. Bathyllus was a grotesque and funny dog, who trode the lighter walks of pantomime; but Pylades was of a serious turn, and excelled in representing stories of a tragical kind. This Pylades actually wrote a treatise on his art, in which he declared that no man could be a good pantomimist (chironomist he was called, from the practice of expressing himself chiefly by the motion of the hand) who did not understand music, geometry, natural and moral philosophy, rhetoric, painting, and sculpture. 'All which the poets have feigned,' wrote Pylades, the clown, 'all which the mythologists have taught, all which the historians have recorded, must ever be present to his recollection.' The pantomimes in those days generally represented the loves or exploits of the gods and goddesses. The skill of the performers seems to have been perfectly wonderful. The snarling old cynic, Demetrius, after witnessing the pantomime of the 'Loves of Mars and Yenus ' (in the time of Nero), said, 'I hear all that you are doing, for it is not only my sight that you address, but your hands appear to 'Speak.' The people of Rome were quite mad at this time about pantomimes and pantomimists. When Nero requested Demetrius to name what gift he desired, the 'old gentleman asked for a pantomimist, and assigned as a reason that he had many neighbours of whose language his own people were ignorant, but that if he were in possession of one of the performers in the pantomime he need not provide himself with interpreters. The Emperor Augustus was extremely partial to the pantomimists. By his command they were exempted from that corporal punishment to which mimics and players were exposed, and they were indulged moreover by a release from certain civil prohibitions. This, however, caused the fraternity to presume upon their privileges. Bathyllus and Pylades became jealous of each other, and their partizans got up rows in the streets, and this caused some of their privileges to be withdrawn. Shortly after this Bathyllus died, and Pylades had the field all to himself, which made him intolerably conceited and overbearing. On one occasion, when a critic hissed him, he stopped in the middle of his performance and pointed the man out to the indignation of the audience. For this he was banished; but the populace soon brought him back again. Another rival to Pylades now appeared in one Hylas, a pupil of the deceased Bathyllus. Pylades and Hylas contended together in the same theatre, and the passages of wit between them, seem to have been exceedingly smart. In trying to represent the character of Agamemnon, in a particular line which termed him 'the great," Hylas stood up on his tiptoes. 'That,' said Pylades, 'is being tall, not great.' The audience called upon him to do it better himself, and when he came to the line he threw himself into an attitude of meditation, thus giving an idea of the first characteristic of a great man. Augustus became alarmed at these disputes, possibly thinking them a little too political, and calculated to excite the populace; but Pylades argued with him, and pointed out the advantage which the emperor gained, as long as the attention of the Romans could be diverted by pantomimes from the consideration of their political subjection. 'Sire,' he said, 'you are ungrateful: the best thing that can happen to you is that they should busy themselves about us.' Pylades was evidently better versed in statecraft than the emperor. Hylas seems to have been a very irritating rival of the old favourite. But he paid the penalty of his provocations at last. A partizan of Pylades caught him one night, and gave him a sound horsewhipping on his own door-step.

In the reign of Tiberius the quarrels of the players grew yet worse. Blood was shed in the theatres, and not only were the lives of some spectators sacrificed in the squabble, but several of the emperor's guards were killed. It was consequently proposed in the senate to subject the pantomimists to corporal punishment; but it was eventually considered disrespectful to the memory of Augustus to repeal his act of exemptions. Regulations, however, were made for reducing the enormous sums which had hitherto been granted for producing pantomimes, and some provisions were made for diminishing the arrogance of the performers. Senators were forbidden to enter their houses. Roman knights were not allowed to follow in their suite, and their exhibitions were prohibited elsewhere than in the theatres. But in the course of a few years the disorders arising from these theatrical performances increased to such a pitch that all the actors were banished from Italy.

They crept back again, however, in the reign of Caligula, and soon acquired all their old licence. Nero found much amusement in their squabbles, and often took part in them. On one occasion, when stones and benches were flying about in the theatre, Nero actively participated in the fray, and broke the praetor's head with a footstool. The pantomimists under this reign were once more the delicise (the delights) of the Romans. Again, however, they were banished; and again they were brought back at the demand of the Roman youth, who could not exist without their pantomimes. Under Domitian their performances became of a very profligate character. The great performer of these days, Paris, was accused of being too intimate with some of the high-blooded dames of Rome. He devised and acted a pantomime called the 'Amour of Leda,' which won great applause, chiefly, it would appear, because it was not very decent. The emperor's wife, Domitia, fell in love with this handsome clown and was divorced in consequence.

The Roman pantomimists were employed at this time not only upon the stage, but to amuse the guests at great houses during dinner. They appeared as carvers, and the flying knife which they brandished was directed with a different movement to each dish. He was considered to know little of his art who could not vary his flourish as he operated upon a hare, or a hen or a lark.

There were amateur pantomimists in those days. Stage-struck Roman youths paid large sums of money to be allowed to play, and their friends seem to have countenanced and supported them. Pliny tells a story of two youthful Romans of equestrian rank who died while exhibiting in the same pantomime. The scandals which arose in consequence of these unseemly proceedings led to the final suppression of the pantomimists by Trajan.

The pantomimes of the Romans were called Fabulae Atellenae, from Atella, the name of a town, where they were first introduced on a small scale. The actors wore masks and high-heeled shoes, furnished with brass or iron heels, which jingled as they danced. Latterly the fabulae were designed to admit of a good deal of horse play and knocking about, and it is not by any means improbable that the actors may have been in the habit of burning each other with red-hot pokers. It is very certain that a kick in a certain place was held to be a very good joke, and was always rapturously applauded. The Fabulae Atellanae and the Chironomists are therefore fairly entitled to be regarded as the first examples of the pantomime and its modern performers—clown, pantaloon, harlequin, and columbine.


Wednesday, September 19, 2018

GOD, according to the Encyclopaedia of Occultism

GOD, According to the Encyclopaedia of Occultism - Join my Facebook Group

God: According to the ancient magical conception of God in the scheme of the universe, evil is the inevitable contrast and complement of good. God permits the existence of the shadow in order that it may intensify the purity of the light. Indeed he has created both and they are inseparable the one being necessary to and incomprehensible without the other.

The very idea of goodness loses its meaning if considered apart from that of evil—Gabriel is a foil to Satan and Satan to Gabriel. The dual nature of the spiritual world penetrates into every department of life material and spiritual. It is typified in light and darkness, cold and heat, truth and error, in brief, the names of any two opposing forces will serve to illustrate the great primary law of nature— viz. the continual conflict between the positive or good and the negative or evil.

For a scriptural illustration of this point, let the story of Cain and Abel be taken. The moral superiority of his brother is at first irksome to Cain, finally intolerable. He murders Abel, thus bringing on his own head the wrath of God and the self-punishment of the murderer. For in killing Abel he has done himself no good, but harm. He has not done away with Abel's superiority, but has added to himself a burden of guilt that can be expiated only by much suffering.

Suffering is shewn in the Scriptures to be the only means by which evil is overcome by good. Cain re-appears in the story of the prodigal son, who after privation and suffering is restored to his father who forgives him fully and freely.

The possibility of sin and error is therefore entirely consistent with and even inseparable from life, and the great sinner a more vital being than the colourless character, because having greater capacity for evil he has also greater capacity for good, and in proportion to his faults so will his virtues be when he turns to God. "There is more joy in heaven over one sinner that repenteth than over ninety and nine just persons," because more force of character, more power for good or evil is displayed by the sinner than by the feebly correct. And that power is the most precious thing in life.

This great dual law, right and wrong, two antagonistic forces, call them what we will, is designated by the term duad. It is the secret of life and the revelation of that secret means death. This secret is embodied in the myth of the Tree of Knowledge in Genesis. At death the discord will be resolved, but not till then.

From the duad is derived the triad on which is based the doctrine of the Trinity. Two forces producing equilibrium, the secret of nature, are designated by the duad, and these Three, call them life, good, evil, constitute one law. By adding the conception of unity to that of the triad we arrive at the tetrad, the perfect number of four, the source of all numerical combinations. According to theology there are three persons in God, and these three form one Deity. Three and one make four because unity is required to explain the Three. Hence, in almost all languages, the name of God consists of four letters. Again, two affirmations make two negations either possible or necessary. According to the Kabalists the name of the Evil One consisted of the same four letters spelled backward, signifying that evil is merely the reflection or shadow of good—"The last reflection or imperfect mirage of light in shadow."

All which exists in light or darkness, good or evil, exists through the tetrad. The triad or trinity, then, is explained by the duad and resolved by the tetrad.

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Great Men Who Were Avid Readers In Childhood


Great Men Who Were Eager Readers In Childhood—The Advantage Of Much Reading, And Of Diligent, Private Studying.

Any physician who has the intention of having his son follow the same vocation, and would make of him a capable physician, should give the boy, first, a beautifully illustrated zoological work written somewhat in the style of Brehm's "Animal Life." After that he should give him an interestingly written book on zoology, in which the anatomical parts are also presented with pretty illustrations. Following this, he should give him a botany with good illustrations, in which the practical value of the plants and their medicinal qualities are pointed out. If thus in the boy be awakened pleasure in animals and plants—in regard to minerals the same could be done—he would surely then enjoy strolling around in the open country, in the woods and the field, making his own observations. In this way he would sharpen his eyes; he would learn to see everything and note it, and such acute observations would be the best foundation for making of him a capable physician. Further on, thanks to his awakened love for nature, he would follow up with interest other branches of the natural sciences, physics, and chemistry; and this could be encouraged by putting at his disposal well and clearly written— not in the dry teaching style—books on physics and chemistry. If he sees in addition, in school, experiments with various chemical substances, he will, conforming with the taste of youth, read at home with still more pleasure, not in his short textbooks, but in popular works written with greater interest and supplied with beautiful illustrations.

Such private reading, such private diligence, which is worth gold, should be encouraged by all possible means, because, as the examples of many great men show, they have been eager readers during their childhood. Albrecht von Haller began as a child to study grammars of various foreign languages, even the Chaldean, spending the whole day in reading, which he was, by the way, compelled to do on account of his delicate health. The great physicist and mathematician Ampere was, as Moebius said: "A vulture in reading" (lesegeier), who read through all the twenty volumes of an encyclopedia, which fell into his hands, one volume after another. At the age of 14 he received from a bookseller the works of the great mathematicians Bernouilli and Euler. When he was told that the books were written in Latin, he learned Latin for the purpose, and then studied the books. This child was, moreover, so gifted for mathematics that even before he knew the numbers he was figuring with little pebbles and beans. And when once he was sick, and after three days fasting received a piece of zwieback, he did not eat it, but broke it and used the pieces for figuring. Even in his boyhood days Francis Bacon read philosophical treatises, and already then showed an aversion toward Aristotle, on account of "the unfruitfulness of his ways." How smart the child was is shown by the answer he once gave to the queen when she asked him how old he was, he answered: "Only two years less than the happy reign of Your Majesty."

Pascal engaged himself with mathematical problems as a child, and at the age of 14 he published his paper about the conic sections. Abraham Lincoln, also as a boy, was so eager to read that he borrowed all sorts of books from the farmers in the neighborhood, and read them all day. I am inclined to attribute to this private reading of a child great importance for his future life, of course, only when useful books are read and not backstairs novels. The latter, as well as robber novels, may often do great damage to children with their undeveloped experience and judgment. They can even be the cause of crimes in minors, or even induce them to leave their parents' home for adventures, and imitate the life of Robinson Crusoe in some distant parts of the world.

When a child shows such a craving for reading—usually they are intelligent or early matured children—we must consider it as a manifestation of nature, as a kind of instinct driving them to gather experience about this world. We must, then, direct this passion into the right channels, and as much as possible encourage them; of course, without doing harm to the development of the body. It is very important that only good books should be given into the hands of children, preferably such where useful knowledge is presented in narrative form. The selection of the subject is best made according to the congenital inclinations of the children, or the educational purpose set in view. At any rate, a congenital inclination for a certain subject should be encouraged by all means, and particularly private reading of valuable books in the direction of their inclination. The present-day school, with its levelling of everything to one pattern idea, is averse to such one-sided inclinations and abilities, even killing all originality, and so appeal must be taken to the private diligence of such children. Of course, it may then happen that by giving themselves up entirely to such studies the subjects taken up in school are neglected, and then talented children make bad pupils. This has, however, very little to do with their future position in life. Indeed, it can be observed often enough, and I saw it in my classmates, that those who have been hardest pluggers in school occupy only a very moderate position in life, and the so-called bad pupils attain the highest positions or become distinguished men, and this not because of the school instruction which they had received, but due to the privately pursued studies. In school they were bad pupils because they had to learn there, by compulsion, subjects which they did not like, but when out of school they could devote themselves to studying subjects which they preferred, and have accomplished great things. This private application, perfecting congenital abilities through much reading, observation and exercise, I consider as the surest road to future greatness. What was acquired by private studying I rate much higher than what was learned by more or less compulsion. If anyone gets continually deeper into the same subject, he very soon finds in it something new every day which remained unnoticed to other investigators, and thus the way becomes paved for important discoveries and inventions. Such strong private diligence and private study—wherein all compulsion is gone—has led many a poor boy to highest positions, for example, Gottlob Nathusius, once a poor errand-boy, became a millionaire, and one of the greatest merchants in Germany. As he had no means to buy books for himself, he saved every piece of waste-paper whereon was printed an article on commerce and industry to read them over during the earliest morning hours. The love for reading induced him to use all the money he could spare from his meagre wages in buying valuable books, for instance, the works of Adam Smith "On the Nature and Cause of National Wealth," which he read through so often that he knew it by heart. His knowledge acquired in this fashion has then brought him forward. The great physicist Faraday became a bookbinder apprentice only to satisfy his desire for reading. Rousseau, even as a small boy, swallowed all kinds of books which got into his hands: novels, also Virgil, Horace, books on astronomy, etc. Helmholtz, as a boy, read with passion all books on physics which he found in his father's library. Liebig, again, read as a boy all books on chemistry which he could find in the court library. Humphry Davy, when a boy, also read everything that fell into his hands. The future course of development of these great men was undoubtedly very favorably influenced by the diligently pursued private reading. Leibnitz had, as a child, a great desire for reading, and so his father opened his library for him, and said, "Tolle, lege." Also when an old man he was so very eager to read that he hardly got up from his seat for days.

A similar example of a ravenous desire for reading was also presented by the distinguished optician, Frauenhofer, who served as an apprentice to a hard-hearted master who prohibited him reading. He was mostly compelled to go outside of the city limits to be able to read undisturbed. The great mathematician Fourier, who, as a son of a poor tailor, was brought to the school of the Benedictines by a bishop, remained up whole nights to study by the light of small candle stumps which he collected in the kitchen and the passageways of the college. The great physicist Arago, from whose speech delivered in memory of Fourier the above data are taken, is the instructive example of the success of private diligent study and ravenous desire for reading. He was such a bad pupil that he was hardly able to read properly at the age 12 years. Then a lieutenant awakened in him the desire for mathematics by telling him that with the knowledge of it he could enter the school of polytechnics. He then had sent to him mathematical books from Paris, and thus studied alone the analysis of the infinite by Euler, the Mecanique Celeste, by Laplace, etc. When he, at the age of i4 years, was examined by Monge for entrance into the school, the latter was struck by the wide mathematical knowledge of the boy. From the example of Arago, and from my own experience as well, I draw the conclusion that what a man knows really well is mostly not what he learned in school, but by his own diligent private study. I look upon the object of school to be mainly not so much the acquisition of knowledge as the instruction in the ways and means as to how the knowledge can be acquired by private studying. It should encourage private home study without compulsion. A boy learns something much more willingly when it is not done by compulsion, but when impelled to it by his own inclination. Those parents may be considered lucky whose children have such a desire for reading; of course, only if it is directed into the proper channels. Reading without selection should not be permitted, because this may lead to overexertion, and do rather harm. Only that should be read which is of value and can be) used; and, first of all, it should be read critically. Corresponding with the grade of their intelligence, readers will proceed differently. The intelligent would overlook what is evidently false and untrue, and would not overburden his memory with it, whereas the stupid would harm himself by much reading without judgment. Just as little as the dull may be made wiser by teaching can he be made so by much reading. Moreover, it can be very often observed that only intelligent children and adults manifest a desire for reading useful books. By extensive reading a man can enrich his knowledge; and, if it is carried on in a rational way, also his store of experience, and thus, the same as with learning, increase his ability of judgment, because much reading means much learning. Descartes said that study should be for the purpose of being able to judge better. Just as what was studied, so also what is read, can be retained best if, as Albrecht von Haller did, one reads always with the pencil in his hand and continually makes notes. Plinius, senior, was a great reader, or, more properly speaking, he had somebody reading to him all the time, whether he was eating or taking a walk. At the same time he had a secretary with him whose duty it was to make extracts for him. A more ardent reader and student than the great Albrecht von Haller has hardly ever existed. He was reading while on the street, at the table, and even on horseback. His knowledge was astonishing, and it also was many-sided, just as we admire it in other great old masters, such as Erasmus of Rotterdam, Boerhaave, Swammerdam, in contrast with frequently one-sided dry scientists of the present day. He was not only a great naturalist, but also a poet and historical writer; and, besides that, also a kind of Mezzofanti. While he was making a post-mortem examination he learned from a Swedish hearer the principally used Swedish expressions. He asked him the meaning of the different words, and thus, after a short time, he was able to speak Swedish!

The old great masters were, in general, exceedingly well read and of such many-sidedness that they could put many of our present scientists in the shade. Boerhaave was not only a great physician, but also at home in philosophy, in the various dead languages, in Chaldean, and in Hebrew. He also delivered lectures in mathematics and in philosophy. Pascal was a mathematician, a physicist, a philosopher, and a writer. His "Lettres Provinciales" passed through sixty editions. Kant was very efficient in astronomy and mathematics, and, at the same time, one of the greatest philosophers in the world. Most-sided, however, was Swedenborg. Besides his medical publications, which some years ago were recommended by Professor Neuberg in Vienna, and in which were expressed views which have now been confirmed, he was editor of the first journal on natural history in Sweden, of the "Daedalus Hyperboreus," and regular assessor of the Swedish Miners' College. By a number of publications he has proven to be a genius in the domain of mathematics, astronomy, geology, mineralogy, metallurgy; and his cosmological publications made great impression, and have shown him to us as a forerunner of many great discoveries. He also published great medical and theological books. He was also one of the founders of the Royal Scientific Society in Upsala. At that time many distinguished theologians and philosophers were also studying medicine. Bossuet, the distinguished preacher, described the stomach-juice as a very sharp-tasted watery substance which so cuts the meat apart that it entirely loses its original form. He called the arteries the peripheral hearts, and foresaw the life doctrine of Flourens long before him. Descartes also diligently pursued anatomical studies in Port Royal to find the seat of the soul, and was recklessly cutting into living animals, as, according to his philosophy, animals have no soul, therefore present only dead matter, and consequently cannot feel.

Such stupendous many-sidedness would be indeed an exceedingly rare occurrence in our days. We must not forget, however, that the general enormous increase in our knowledge in all domains makes it, in comparison with former times, very difficult to acquire universal knowledge. Many-sidedness is, anyhow, a qualification which is only seen in geniuses, as in Goethe, for instance; and in such geniuses our century is lacking. The eight to nine years of study in a school takes away too much energy and leaves no time free for ardent manifestations and continuous practice of ingenious dispositions, which is the only way possible to accomplish something really great. It is, therefore, no wonder that there were great classics and geniuses only until the beginning of the nineteenth century, when the introduction of the college and school examinations began to show their fatal effect. Nowadays we live more in the age of one-sidedness. A scientist, for instance, becomes absorbed in metabolism work of a certain branch, and he cultivates that until his death; everything else leaves him entirely uninterested; besides he would never have the time for anything else, even if he wished it. Until first youth is nearly over, one is engaged nowadays in compulsory studying for the sake of getting some position, and only then does it become possible to devote one's self to studies of inclination. And just such studies that a man pursues with pleasure are those which may lead him to something great. If a father wants to make of his son a distinguished man he can best accomplish that by arranging so that his boy may learn everything with pleasure, and then devote himself with pleasure to those subjects which are connected with his career. If, however, he takes up a vocation by compulsion, he will never show any diligence privately, and will never accomplish anything of importance. He will only be a man of mediocrity.

Monday, September 17, 2018

Finding Random Tweets About Books

It's interesting what you can find by searching random tweets about books in one day:

Margaret Thatcher
I am a great admirer of Professor Hayek. Some of his books are absolutely supreme - "The Constitution of Liberty" and the three volumes on "Law, Legislation and Liberty" - and would be well read by almost every hon. Member.
...........

Awesome Life Changing Nonfiction Books & Wide Range Of Topics, Free Kindle Nonfiction Books $1 Deals – http://www.nonfictionfreebooks.com
...........

Happy birthday to one of my all-time favorite comic book writers, Roger Stern! Stern wrote epic runs on THE AVENGERS, AMAZING SPIDER-MAN, the Superman books and many more iconic series. He was consistently great and always had a flair for character moments. Wish him well!
..........

“Books should go where they will be most appreciated and not sit unread…” Christopher Paolini
..........

Hildegard of Bingen, German Abbess, visionary, composer & polymath, died #OnThisDay in 1179. She founded 2 monasteries & wrote the earliest Medieval morality play, musical compositions & almost 400 letters, as well as books on her visions, natural history & medicine.
..........

.@glennbeck's New Book #AddictedtoOutrage is hitting the shelves TOMORROW!
..........

NPR: Vladimir Nabokov has always denied that a famous case of rape and kidnapping influenced "Lolita", his most well-known novel. In her new, astute book, Sarah Weinman argues otherwise.
..........

Just finished Capote’s True Blood and honestly, I don’t see the fuss about it. Certainly not the worst book I have read, but there are certainly better true crime books out there.
..........

7 UK True Crime Books From 2017 & 2018 That Are Totally Terrifying
..........

Author Of ‘How To Murder Your Husband’ Arrested For Allegedly Killing Her Husband
https://bit.ly/2NaT8RO
..........

Medieval Torture and Execution of Modern Serial Killers https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07CPQM85V
..........

"I highly recommend this book to all lovers of the true-crime genre.” – Donna Carrick, Host, Dead to Writes podcast on my book “The Boy on the Bicycle” (re Ron Moffatt, wrongly convicted in 1956 of murder at age 14 in Toronto) @ Amazon: https://tinyurl.com/y7gkmcq4 
..........

Was ‘Lolita’ inspired by a true crime? A new book offers tantalizing evidence it was. https://wapo.st/2PDw5vC
..........

1983 Literature Laureate William Golding's novel 'Lord of the Flies' was first published #OnThisDay, 17 September 1954. The novel rapidly became a world success and has since then been read by tens of millions of readers all over the world.
.........

Finished reading Ayn Rand's debut novel, We The Living. A powerful work of literature on the tragedy of the individual spirit living under the evil of collectivism in which Ayn Rand began to formulate a new moral ideal that she masterfully presents in her later work.
.........

An idea, like a ghost, must be spoken to a little before it will explain itself.
—Charles Dickens—
.........

David Copperfield (@D_Copperfield) who took his stage name from the Charles Dickens character, is 62 today.
.........

Today marks the start of my bi-annual re-reading of Philip Sugden's tome (Jack the Ripper) in my opinion - the best book ever written on the subject. Possibly one of the greatest true crime books ever.
..........

Charlotte Brontë: "The shadows are as important as the light."
..........

finding out that Charlotte Bronte was only FOUR FOOT NINE has unsettled me on a molecular level
..........

"The labours of men of genius, however erroneously directed, scarcely ever fail in ultimately turning to the solid advantage of mankind" (Mary Shelley, 1931 Frankenstein).
..........

"Even the darkest night will end and the sun will rise." -Victor Hugo
..........

Trailblazers: Before Agatha Christie was crowned the Queen of Crime; Kiwi author Ngaio Marsh was even more popular http://nzh.nu/1GeG30lQmra
..........

Trivia: When Conan Doyle first dreamt up his two most famous characters, he planned to call them "Ormond Sacker" and "Sherrinford Holmes." A few weeks later he changed their names to "Dr. John Watson" and "Sherlock Holmes."
..........

I liked a @YouTube video http://youtu.be/awGN5NApDy4?a  Voynich Code - The Worlds Most Mysterious Manuscript - The Secrets of Nature
..........

Thinking about the hurricane, I read Erik Larson's Isaac's Storm this summer. Great book about the 1900 Galveston hurricane that killed 12,000 and the birth of hurricane forecasting and the National Weather Service. Nothing but respect for forecasters.
..........

Humour is THE most popular ingredient in books that children read for pleasure. It’s also one of the hardest to create. It’s much easier to be clever than funny.

Sunday, September 16, 2018

The Ghosts of the Alamo


From History and Legends of the Alamo: And Other Missions in and Around San Antonio By Adina de Zavala 1917

It is a well known fact that the papers of San Antonio, years ago, from time to time, chronicled marvelous tales of ghosts appearing at the Alamo. That the Alamo was guarded by ghosts was one of the current folk-tales of the country. When General Andrade, the Mexican general sought to destroy the Alamo, after the battle of San Jacinto, in 1836, it is said that his men were everywhere met by spirits with flaming swords who barred their progress and soon frightened them off; that almost as fast as new relays of men were sent with orders to destroy the walls, they were overcome by fright; nor could threats or punishment induce them to return. They were permitted by the ghosts for a space to disarm the batteries, but the moment the walls of the buildings were threatened, there was the flaming sword in ghostly hands. It is a matter of history that the Alamo buildings were not destroyed, and not much injured by Andrade. The Alamo was dismantled of its works, guns, etc., "the fosse filled up, and the pickets torn up and burned," but only the single outer walls of the mission-square were injured. The reason it was not destroyed, say the current tales of the day, was because of fear, of the threats and prophecy of "the spirits with the flaming swords" whom the Mexican soldiers feared more than they feared their officers.

These spirits ordered them to desist in hollow tones which struck terror to their hearts, "Depart, touch not these walls! He who desecrates these walls shall meet a horrible Fate! Multiplied afflictions shall seize upon him and a horrible and agonizing and avenging torture shall be his death!"

Was this prophecy fulfilled? Those who know the old folk-tale say, "It was, and will ever be:" And among other things you will hear if you doubt, is: "Search into the miserable lives and deaths of those responsible for the tearing down of part of the Alamo!" and, "Is it not, at least, a strange coincidence that the man who, more than any other one person, was deliberately responsible for the destruction of the upper story of the old Alamo Portress met such a horrible, agonizing fate? —entombed alive and consumed by flames—that his worst enemy could not fail to be moved with pity."

...........................

GHOSTS OF THE ALAMO.

There's the tramp of a ghost on the low winds tonight,
And echo that drifts like a dream on its way;
There's the blur of the specter that leaves for the fight,
Grave-risen at last from a long vanished day;
There's the shout and the call of grim soul unto soul
As they rise one by one, out of death's shadowed glen
To follow the bugle—the drum's muffled roll,
Where the Ghosts of the Alamo gather again.

I hear Crockett's voice as he leaps from the dust
And waits at the call for an answering hail;
And Bowie caresses a blade red with rust
As deep in the shadows he turns to the trail;
Still lost in the darkness that covers their sleep
Their bodies may rest in a sand-mounded den,
But their spirits have come from the red, starry steep
Where Ghosts of the Alamo gather again.

You think they've forgotten—because they have slept—
The day Santa Anna charged in with his slaves;
Where five thousand men 'gainst a few hundred swept
And stormed the last rampart that stood for their graves?
You think they've forgotten; but faint, from afar,
Brave Travis is calling the roll of his men
And a voice answers "Here!" Through the shadows that bar
Where Ghosts of the Alamo gather again.

There's a flash on a blade—and you thought it a star?
There's a light on the plain—and you thought it the moon?
You thought the wind echoed that anthem of war?
Not knowing the lilt of an old border tune;
Gray shade after shade, stirred again unto breath;
Gray phantom by phantom they charge down the glen,
 Where souls hold a hate that is greater than death,
"Where Ghosts of the Alamo gather again.

—Grantland Rice, in New York Tribune.

 

Sadism and Crime in History


Sado-Masochism and Crime in History by Joseph Richardson Parke 1912

See also Notorious Criminals, Crimes & Criminology - 100 Books on DVDrom

For a list of all of my digital books and ebooks (PDF and Amazon)  click here

In attempting to define sadism, Havelock Ellis is led to the conclusion, by others I believe overlooked, that it is not a perversion due to excessive masculinity; a conclusion well corroborated not only by the fact that strong men are more apt to be tender than cruel, and the most cruel men to be feminine in character, but the equally remarkable fact that the skull of De Sade, himself, according to the phrenologist who examined it, was so small and well formed that "one would take it at first for a woman's."

Indeed, the sadistic impulse, in my opinion, is quite as common in women as in men. I had a little daughter, since deceased, who possessed a small Chinese poodle, upon which she lavished the entire wealth of a peculiarly affectionate nature; and whipping that poodle, dashing cold water upon it, and treading upon its tail, were pastimes which not only afforded her the very keenest enjoyment, but were indubitably the concomitants of an equally strong affection, and few parents will be found who have not observed similar manifestations of active cruelty in their children.

That women can be gentle as kittens, or cruel as tigers, is a proverb founded on absolute fact; while it is only necessary to read the literature of Goethe, Heine, Platen, Hamerling, Byron and other authors, to recognize, in the affectionate submission of the heroine to the exactions arid cruelty of a tyrannical lover, that masochistic feeling which is a part of almost very woman's nature.

It is impossible to treat sadism, I repeat, apart from masochism, one being complementary to the other. The former represents the active role of absolute domination, and the latter, as Krafft-Ebing remarks, "a peculiar perversion of the psychical vita sexualis in which the individual affected, in sexual feeling and thought, is controlled by the idea of being completely subject to the will of a person of the opposite sex; and of being treated by this person as by a master, and humiliated and abused."

It was from the peculiar character of the Austrian novelist, Sacher-Masoch, who first discovered his perversion by the pleasure he experienced in being kicked in the face by his mistress, that Krafft-Ebing was led to adopt the term masochism, as the counterpart of sadism; but, as I have previously remarked, a careful consideration of the phenomena of both conditions will lead us to discard even an imaginary line of demarcation. De Sade, himself, was not a pure sadist, any more than SacherMasoch was a pure masochist, the sexual algophily of which Fere speaks being equally applicable in both cases; and the term algolagnia—pain with sexual excitement—which Schrenk-Notzing invented to cover both sadism and masochism, seems fairly adequate to describe both the passive and active forms of the perversion.

I am not sure that I am absolutely correct, indeed, in applying the term abnormal to either of these perversions; the instinct to bite, for instance, in sexual excitement being so universal as to fall readily within the lines of normality; and it is only when we go beyond this, and into the more pronounced forms of instinctive cruelty, that the adopted classification appears justified. The impulse of furibund passion, as manifested in the love-bite, may or may not be to shed blood; if it be the latter, and.not the mere emotional outburst of sexual detumescence, common to all animals, it is a perfectly natural manifestation of the law which makes courtship only a modified form of combat, of which blood is the natural concomitant. Thus, the heroes of De Sade's novels plan scenes of debauchery in which the shedding of blood is a necessary element of the fullest sexual enjoyment; and with the Hungarian, Countess Bathory, and Marshall Gilles de Rais, we find lust only satisfied with the death of innumerable victims.


The intimate relation between whipping and sexual passion has already been noticed. Cases were cited in which castigation was the only means of producing tumescence in certain persons, and Carnevin corroborates the same fact in reference to animals, in his case of a Hungarian stallion in which application of the whip had always to be resorted to to produce erection. Notwithstanding Fere's attempt to associate this phenomenon with the tonic effect of pain on the nerves, I am of opinion that we must seek its explanation rather in psychic causes; in the same influence, for instance, which arouses fear and anger, both of which, being fundamental to courtship and rivalry, may very well enter even more largely into the stronger passion.

Indeed, many lines of evidence directly lead to such a conclusion. The whipping of one boy has frequently been known to excite the sexual passions of another; the phenomenon being one of such general observation among school-teachers as to constitute their strongest argument against correctional castigation in educational institutions. Rousseau gives us an account of the development of his own masochistic tendency, from witnessing the punishment of children; and in the sadistic cases recorded by Regis and Krafft-Ebing, similar causative factors are observed.

The latter writer tells of a neurasthenic girl who derived the greatest pleasure from being spanked by her father, and whose subsequent longing was "to be the slave of a man, lying in fancy before him, he putting one foot upon my neck, while I kiss the other."

Anthropology tells us that there was a time when women were only won by blows, force and robbery; and it is quite possible that the relation between love and pain is, to some extent at least, as asserted by Schafer, atavistic. The pleasure, indeed necessity, of battle, murder and rape, in the animal world, makes it extremely probablethat sadistic outbreaks such as the terrible Whitechapel outrages, Lombroso's case of the man, Philippe, who, arrested for strangling prostitutes, after intercourse with them, said, "I am fond of women, but it's sport to choke them afterwards, and many others, of similar character, are only lingering remnants of a primitive law. However that be, there is scarcely a doubt that many, if not all, of the modern lust-murders of children are of sadic origin.

The Menesclou case is fairly typical of these. "Menesclou was arrested on a charge of abducting a four-year-old girl from her parents' residence; and, when taken into custody, the forearm of the child was found in his pocket. The head and entrails, in a half-burned condition, were discovered in the stove, but the genitals of the girl could not be found, being probably secreted and used by him for sexual purposes." "These circumstances, as well as the finding of a lewd poem in his pocket, left no doubt that he had violated the child, and then murdered her."

Another, that of the clerk Alton, is distinctly sadistic. He was a professed violator and murderer of little girls, luring them into thickets, and vacant buildings; and, on his arrest, entries like the following were found in his note-book: "Killed a young girl today; it was fine and hot.'" "Jack the Ripper," of Whitechapel fame; Holmes, who was executed in Philadelphia in 1896, convicted of the murder of nearly twenty women, and Johann Hoch, the Chicago Bluebeard, hanged in Feb., 1906, for more than an equal number of female murders, furnish remarkable instances of the same sexual perversion.

The confession of the pellagrous vampire, Verzeni, is interesting as affording an example of sadistic anthropopagy. "I had an unspeakable delight in strangling women," he remarks, "experiencing during the act erections, and intense sexual pleasure. It was a pleasure even to smell female clothing. The feeling of pleasure while strangling them was much greater than that which I felt when masturbating. I took great delight in drinking their blood, and in pulling the pins out of the hair of my victims. My mother first came to suspect me from noticing the spots of semen on my shirt, after each murder. I never touched the genitals of the women. It satisfied me sexually to fust seize them by the neck and suck their blood. During the strangling, I pressed myself against the entire body, but did not think of one part more than another."

He further states that he came to his perverse condition entirely independently of outside influences, his first experience of sexual pleasure coming from the wringing of chickens' necks.

That active sexuality is not at the bottom of all outrages, however, is well shown by the case of the Spaniard, Gruyo, who, while physically impotent, still continued his horrible deeds, strangling no fewer than six women in ten years. He covered his tracks with such care that, for the above period, he remained undetected, choking his victims, who were usually prostitutes, and tearing out their kidneys and intestines through the vagina.

Tarnowsky tells of a physician who, while ordinarily capable of normal intercourse, found that, when excited with wine, he was compelled to prick the woman's buttocks, and see blood, before he could have ejaculation, or obtain satiety of his lust; and Demme records the case of a man who was led from masturbation by, and sodomy upon, little girls, to lust-murder by the haunting thought of how pleasant it would be to stab a young and pretty girl in the region of the genitals, while having intercourse with her, and see the blood running from the knife. [This recalls the mythological legend of the vampires, originating, possibly, among the Greeks, in the myth of the laminae and marmolykes, blood-sucking women and men, a full account of which may be found in Tylor's "Prim. Cult.," 1893, Ch. xv. Goethe also makes use of it in his "Bride of Corinth," and there is little doubt, in my mind at least, that the origin of such outre fictional characters as Bram Stoker's Dracula, and the Slavonic and Albanian beliefs so gravely set forth in Ranft's "De Masticatione Mortuorum in Tumulis," and Calmet's "Dissertation on the Vampires of Hungary," is to be found in the nocturnal depredations of sexual sadists, whose abnormality escaped detection through the fact that it was not then recognized or known.]

That sadism is not infrequent in women is also shown by Case 42, of Krafft-Ebing. "A married man presented himself with numerous cuts and scars on the arms. He told their origin as follows: When
he wished to have intercourse with his wife, who was young and nervous, he first had to make a cut in his arm. Then she would suck the wound, and during the act become violently excited sexually."

History is full of further instances of sadistic instinct in the sex, of which possibly Valeria Messalina and Catherine di Medici are the most noted; the latter, along with being the secret instigator of the awful St. Bartholomew Massacre, finding great pleasure, we are told, in having the ladies of her court whipped before her.



Visit A Tribute to my Beloved Dog Teddy

Friday, September 14, 2018

When Frogs Fell from the Skies


When Frogs Fell from the Skies, by Waldo L. McAtee (published in the Monthly Weather Review May, 1917)

This 100 year old article sounded so Fortean I had to share this. Enjoy:

The fall of vertebrate animals from the skies like rain is, of course, the most interesting of all the showers of organic matter, and—it must be admitted—the hardest to believe. Yet there cannot be the slightest doubt that there are genuine phenomena of this character, though perhaps not so numerous as the recorded instances. These occurrences, if observed by man, naturally make profound impressions and in the olden times especially, the tales of showers of fishes and the like were improved by each teller, so that soon they reached the stage of the unbelievable.

Frogs, toads.—I quote only one of the older writers, Athenaeus, who flourished about 200 A.D. He is the author of a polyhistorical work called the "Deipnosophists," in which he quotes about 800 authors, whose works he consulted at the Alexandrian Library, 700 of whom would have been unknown, except for the fortunate preservation of Athenaeus' work. In a chapter entitled "De pluvius piscium," he says:

I know also that it has very often rained fishes. At all events Phaenias, in the second book of his Eresian Magistrates, says that in the Chersonesus it once rained fish uninterruptedly for three days; and Phylarchus in his fourth book, says that people had often seen it raining fish, and often also raining wheat, and that the same thing had happened with respect to frogs. At all events Heraclides Lembus, in the 21st book of his history, says: "In Paeonia and Dardania, it has, they say, before now rained frogs; and so great has been the number of these frogs that the houses and the roads have been full with them; and at first for some days the inhabitants, endeavoring to kill them, and shutting up their houses endured the pest; but when they did no good, but found that all their vessels were filled with them, and the frogs were found to be boiled up and roasted with everything they ate, and when besides all this they could not make use of any water, nor put their feet on the ground for the heaps of frogs that were everywhere, and were annoyed also by the smell of those that died, they fled the country."

For numbers of frogs and the far reaching effects of their fall this tale can scarcely be surpassed, but it will be well to recount some later instances, especially some of the more circumstantial ones. Holinshed informs us that in Great Britain—

frogs fell in Angusshire during the time of Agricola. Frogs were reported to have descended, during the summer of 1846 over the Humber, upon the decks of vessels in the river and on the coast near Killinghome lights.

A later account recites that—

During the storm that raged with considerable fury in Birmingham (England) on Wednesday morning, June 30 [1892], a shower of frogs fell in the suburb of Moseley. They were found scattered about several gardens. Almost white in color, they had evidently been absorbed in a small waterspout that was driven over Birmingham by the tempest.

Several notices have from time to time been brought before the French Academy of showers of frogs having fallen in different parts of France. M. Duparque states in a letter that—

In August, 1814, after several weeks of drouth and heat, a storm broke one Sunday about 3:30 p. m., upon the village of Fremon, a quarter league from Amiens. This storm was preceded by bursts of wind so violent that they shook the church and frightened the congregation. While traversing the space separating the church from presbytery, we were soaked, but what surprised me was to be struck on my person and my clothing by small frogs. * * * A large number of these small animals hopped about on the ground. On arriving at the presbytery, we found the floor of one of the rooms in which a window facing the storm had been left open covered with water and frogs.

Showers of toads seem to be more common in some regions than those of frogs. I have seen accounts of 13 different occurrences of the kind in France. A French scientist M. Mauduy, curator of natural history at Poitiers, had personal experience with two such showers, which he narrates briefly as follows:

On the 23d of June, 1809, during a hot spell, I was caught in a rain storm in which with the very large drops were mixed little bodies the size of hazelnuts, which in a moment, covered the ground, and which I recognized as little toads. * * * The second occasion, occurred in August, 1822, during a stormy and very hot period; I was again surprised by a heavy shower of large drops mixed, as was the other, with little toads, some of which fell on my hat. This time the animals were the size of walnuts. I found that I was more than a league distant from any brook, river, or marsh.

A considerable discussion of the subject of rains of toads was carried on in 1834 in the French scientific magazine from which I have quoted. I cite two more bits of testimony by eye witnesses, one of which has been widely reproduced.

M. Heard, writes:

In June, 1833, I was at Jouy near Versaille. I saw toads falling from the sky; they struck my umbrella; I saw them hopping on the pavement, "during about 10 minutes in which time the drops of water were not more numerous than the toads. The space upon which I saw the multitude of these animals was about 200 fathoms.

M. Peltier in his oft-copied statement says:

In support of the communication of Col. Marmier, I cite an incident I observed in my youth; a storm advanced upon the little village of Ham, Department of the Somme, where I lived, and I observed its menacing march, when suddenly rain fell in torrents. I saw the village square covered everywhere with little toads. Astonished by this sight, I held out my hand and was struck by several of the reptiles. The dooryard also was covered; I saw them fall upon the slate roof and rebound to the pavement. * * * Whatever the difficulty of explaining the transport of the reptiles, I affirm, without doubt the fact which made such a profound impression upon my memory.

The most remarkable account of a shower of toads, that I have seen, so far, is the following:

In the summer of 1794 M. Gayet was quartered in the village of Lalain, Department du Nord, * * * near the territory which the Austrians, then masters of Valenciennes, had flooded with water from the Scarpe. It was very hot. Suddenly, at about 3 o'clock in the afternoon, there fell such an abundance of rain that 150 men of the grand guard, in order not to be submerged, were obliged to leave a large depression in which they were hidden. But what was their surprise when there began to fall on the ground all about a considerable number of toads, the size of hazelnuts, which began to jump about in every direction. M. Gayet, who could not believe that these myriads of reptiles fell with the rain, stretched out his handkerchief at the height of a man, his comrades holding the corners; they caught a considerable number of toads, most of which had the posterior part elongated into a tail, that is to say, in the tadpole state. During this rain storm, which lasted about half an hour, the men of the grand guard felt very distinctly on their hats and on their clothing the blows struck by the falling toads. As a final proof of the reality of this phenomenon, M. Gayet reports that after the storm the three-cornered hats of the men of the guard held in their folds some of the reptiles.