Thursday, March 30, 2017

Aristotle and Christianity by JW Lowber 1887


For more see The Philosophy of Plato, Socrates and Aristotle -200 Books on DVDrom

THE ARISTOTELIAN PHILOSOPHY AND CHRISTIANITY 1887

In the history of Greek philosophy, Socrates was the man of action, Plato the man of literature, and Aristotle the man of science. They were, of course, all philosophers, but in the progress of culture they specially represented the phases mentioned. Socrates went about as a preacher of righteousness to all, Plato handled language so artistically as to become a general favorite, but Aristotle came with the dissecting-knife in his hand and addressed himself to those who were willing to make special dissections for the sake of knowledge. He was preeminently a man of science, and has left us the means of expressing many of our ordinary thoughts. When we say that a man is in an unfortunate predicament, we are using the nomenclature of Aristotle. Had it not been for this great Greek thinker modern scientists would be compelled to express many of their thoughts differently.

Aristotle, the greatest of the world's scientific men, was born in Stagira, a Greek colony of Macedonia, in 384 B.C., and died at Chalcis, on the island of Euboea, in 322. The name of his birthplace clung to him in the title by which he was always called-"the Stagirite philosopher." The father of this great philosopher was a physician at the court of the Macedonian king, and is said to have written several works on medicine. This is thought to have exercised a great influence over the studies of his illustrious son. The boy's thirst for knowledge was such that at the early age of seventeen he repaired to the city of Athens, at that time the university of the world, and became a pupil of the distinguished Plato. His progress was such that Plato called him the intellect of his school. He remained a student of this great school for twenty years, and might have remained longer had it not been for the death of Plato. This ought to be a lesson for those who claim to acquire a University education in three or four years. While Aristotle greatly loved his world-renowned teacher, his mental characteristics greatly differed from those of Plato. Plato was poetic and ideal, Aristotle was prosaic and systematic; Plato was intuitive and synthetical, Aristotle was logical and analytical. Such are some of the mental characteristics of the two men, and it is natural to suppose that Aristotle would develop a new system, anu give a different direction to philosophic thought.

About the year 343 B.C., Philip, of Macedon, invited Aristotle to become the teacher of his son Alexander, who was then thirteen years of age. His influence over Alexander was very great, and when the son of Philip became the conqueror of Asia, Aristotle was invited to accompany him upon several of his expeditions. Whenever Alexander found anything he thought would be of scientific interest to his great teacher, he immediately sent it. He is said also to have presented Aristotle with great sums of money with which to prosecute his investigations. About the year 335 B.C., Aristotle returned to Athens, and established -a new school of philosophy. In the forenoon he taught his esoteric class in the deep mysteries of philosophy, and the afternoon he gave to the instruction of those not so far advanced. His school has acquired the name of Peripatetic, on account of his habit of walking while he was giving instruction. He continued to teach until the Athenians, suspecting him of partisanship for Macedonia, caused him to flee to Chalcis, where he died.

In the Aristotelian organon we have exactly the reverse of the Platonic. Plato by logical analysis drew from the depth of consciousness certain fundamental ideas inherent in the mind. These he takes as starting points from which to pass beyond the sensible world to God himself. After having attained to universal and necessary ideas by abstraction, he descends to the sensible world, and from these ideas he constructs his intellectual theory of the universe. Aristotle reverses the process; he commences with sensation, and proceeds by induction from the known to the unknown.

According to Aristotle the repetition of sensations produces recollection, recollection produces experience, and experience science. It is only by means of experience that men can be scientists and artists. While experience is the knowledge of individual things, art is the knowledge of universals. Aristotle taught that there are principles in the mind not derived from experience, and his teachings on the subject are much more philosophic and truthful than the one-sided views of modern utilitarians.

Aristotle was the founder of Logic, and according to Kant and Hegel, the most distinguished of German philosophers, it has made no progress from that time to the present. What he undertook, he made thorough, and it appears that Logic was about perfect when it came from his productive brain. He invented the categories, and limited their number to ten, and he also devised the syllogistics, the science of forming correct conclusions. Our great author is also the father of modern Psychology, and his Psychological system should be carefully studied by all who desire to fully understand his philosophical position. From the fact that he claims that all knowledge begins with individual objects, and these objects are objects of sense, modern sensationalists are disposed to place him at the head of their school. They are, however unfair in this, for Aristotle certainly taught that every science has fundamental principles that can not be proved and depend not upon experience. He employed the terms sensation and experience in a very different sense from which they are employed by modern materialists. He uses sensation in its lowest sense as the excitation of the soul through the body; and, in its highest sense, he makes it synonymous with intuition, and comprehends all immediate intuitive perceptions, whether of sense, consciousness, or reason. Intelligence proper, or the faculty of first principles, is, in some respects, a sense, for it is the source of certain truths which, like the perceptions of the senses, are immediately revealed as facts, to be accepted upon their own evidence. It is about the same as the "sensus communis" of Cicero, and the "common sense" of the Scottish school. John Locke uses the term "reflection" in precisely the sense in which Aristotle uses the word "experience."

The reasoning of Aristotle on the question of causation is perfectly marvelous, and his Theology is certainly an important preparation for Christianity. He reduced his material, formal, efficient, and final causes to two-matter and form. Matter at first has a potential existence, and is without form. It can be brought into shape only by the Eternal Substance, who alone has pure Form. The Eternal Substance was with Aristotle God himself; so the universe could not have had its present form without the omnipotent power of God. Aristotle understood that matter could not move itself, and placed back of it an eternal actuality. As matter could not move itself, the actuality which moved it was of course not matter, and therefore Spirit. Modern Theology is very largely founded upon the Ontological, Cosmological, and Moral proofs given by Aristotle of the existence of one true God.

While Aristotle was the greatest of scientists, he was also a practical man. The Greek mind was eminently practical. If this great thinker had, like so many learned Germans, shut himself up in his library or laboratory, instead of walking out into the realm of common life, he would never have wielded such a powerful influence upon mankind in general. In his works on Ethics and Politics, he has entered into competition with Socrates and Plato as a teacher in social morals and a guide in civil affairs. Many persons oppose Aristotle because they do not understand him.

Lord Bacon was certainly right in opposing those baseless methods of speculation in his day, which stood in the way of truth and claimed for their unfruitful methods the authority of Aristotle. He was, however, wrong in supposing that Aristotle ever taught anything of the kind, or that Aristotle failed to use induction in his reasoning. Good old Martin Luther raved against Aristotle, but it was no more the true Aristotle than the Pope of Rome was the first Apostle. It was doubtless necessary for the false Aristotle to be driven away before the true one could take his proper place. While the French Revolution shook up things in general, it set men to thinking, and prepared the way for the restoration of both Plato and Aristotle to their true position in the history of Ethics.

It has been said to the praise of Aristotle that his system of Ethics contains nothing that a Christian can afford to dispense with, no precept of life which is not an element of Christian character; and that its teachings fail only in elevating the heart and the mind to objects of Divine Revelation. Our great author properly emphasizes the influence of habit upon life, and it is certain that habit has a good deal to do with religion. If certain evil habits are acquired it is very difficult to make a man religious. What is true happiness for man? Aristotle would make it the full satisfaction of the highest elements of his nature. It is certainly the object of Christianity to develop the highest elements of man's nature. There has been a good deal of discussion about the golden mean taught by Aristotle. It must be remembered that Aristotle's view was thoroughly Greek, and based on the analogy of Art. When a Greek would speak of right or wrong, he would speak of it as beautiful or ugly. The object of the Greek was to avoid the too much and the too little, and, in this way, to attain to perfection. Temperance was the mean between greediness and indifference, and liberality was the mean between prodigality and stinginess. While the Aristotelian system of Ethics was by no means perfect, it was certainly an important preparation for that system which is absolutely perfect. Christianity presents the perfect ideal, which can make this world a Paradise.

It appears to me that the great mistake with modern Utilitarians is the fact that they have ignored the past. Hume, Bentham and James Mill persistently ignore the great truths handed down for the use of all ages by the master-minds of antiquity. The disciples of Bentham claim that his discovery of the principle of utility was as great an era in moral science as was the discovery of the principle of gravitation in physical science. The word utility is not distinctive to this school, for it had been appropriated more than a thousand years before the days of Bentham, and everything valuable in Bentham's theory had been taught by others. The school that now calls itself Utilitarian is thoroughly materialistic. It denies the moral virtue of the inner soul, and it is a system of externalism. A school boy who has never seen a mountain looks upon a hill as very high; so persons may look upon modern Utilitarians as giants in thought, until they become acquainted with Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. J. W. LOWBER.

For more see The Philosophy of Plato, Socrates and Aristotle -200 Books on DVDrom

The History of the Antichrist by Lewis Spence 1920


The History of the Antichrist by Lewis Spence 1920

See also The Number 666, the Beast & the Apocalypse - Over 250 Books on DVDROM

For a list of all of my digital books click here

Antichrist: The universal enemy of mankind, who will in the latter days be sent to scourge the world for its wickedness. According to the Abbot Bergier, Antichrist is regarded as a tyrant, impious and excessively cruel, the arch enemy of Christ, and the last ruler of the earth. The persecutions he will inflict on the elect will be the last and most severe ordeal which they will have to undergo. Christ, himself, according to several commentators, foretold that they would have succumbed to it if its duration had not been shortened on their behalf. He will pose as the Messiah, and will perform things wonderful enough to mislead the elect themselves. The thunder will obey him, according to St. John, and Leloyer asserts that the demons below watch over hidden treasures by means of which he will be able to tempt many. It is on account of the miracles that he will perform, that Boguet calls him the "Ape of God," and it is through this scourge that God will proclaim the final judgment and the vengeance to be meted out to wrong-doers.

Antichrist will have a great number of forerunners, and will appear just before the end of the world. St. Jerome claims that he will be a man begotten by a demon; others, a demon in the flesh, visible and fantastical, or an incarnate demon. But, following St. Ireneus, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, and almost all the fathers. Antichrist will be a man similar to, and conceived in the same way as all others, differing from them only in a malice and an impiety more worthy of a demon than of a man. Cardinal Bellarmin, at a later date, and contrary to their authority, asserts however, that Antichrist will be the son of a demon incubus and a sorceress.

He will be a Jew of the tribe of Dan, according to Malvenda, who supports his view by the words of the dying Jacob to his sons: "Dan shall be a serpent by the way— an adder in the path; "—by those of Jeremiah:—"The armies of Dan will devour the earth"; and by the seventh chapter of the Apocalypse, where St. John has omitted the tribe of Dan in his enumeration of the other tribes.

Antichrist will be always at war, and will astonish the earth with his miracles. He will persecute the upright, and will mark his own by a sign on the face or the hand.

Elijah and Enoch will come at length and convert the Jews and will meet death at last by order of Antichrist, Then will Christ descend from the heavens, kill Antichrist with the two-edged sword, which will issue from His mouth, and reign on the earth for a thousand years, according to some; an indefinite time, according to others.

It is claimed by some that the reign of Antichrist will last fifty years: the opinion of the majority is that his reign will last but three and a-half years, after which the angels will sound the trumpets of the day of judgment, and Christ will come and judge the world. The watchword of Antichrist, says Boguet, will be: "I abjure baptism." Many commentators have foreseen the return of Elijah in these words of Malachi: "I will send Elijah, the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord." But it is not certain that Malachi referred to this ancient prophet, since Christ applied this prediction to John the Baptist, when he said: "Elias is come already, and they knew him not;" and when the angel foretold to Zacharias the birth of his son, he said to him: "And he shall go forth before the Lord in the spirit and power of Elias."

By Antichrist may probably be meant the persecutors of the Church. Again, the Protestants give the name to the Pope and the Catholics to all their enemies. Napoleon even has been called Antichrist.

The third treatise in the Histoire Veritable et Memorable des Trois Possidees de Flandre, by Father Sebastien Michalies, dominican friar, throws much light in the words of exorcised demons, on Antichrist. "Conceived through the medium of a devil, he will be as malicious as a madman, with such wickedness as was never seen on earth. An inhuman martyr rather than a human one, he will treat Christians as souls are treated in hell. He will have a multitude of synagogue names, and he will be able to fly when he wishes. Beelzebub will be his father, Lucifer his grandfather."

The revelations of exorcised demons show that Antichrist was alive in 1613. It appears that he has not yet attained his growth "He was baptised on the Sabbath of the sorcerers, before his mother, a Jewess, called La Belle-Fleur. He was three years old in 1613. Louis Gaufridi is said to have baptised him, in a field near Paris. An exorcised sorceress claimed to have held the little Antichrist on her knees. She said that his bearing was proud, and that even then he spoke many divers languages. But he had talons in the place of feet, and he wore no slippers. He will do much harm, but there will be comforters, for the Holy Ghost still lives." His father is shown in the figure of a bird, with four feet, a tail, a bull's head much flattened, horns and black shaggy hair. He will mark his own with a seal representing this in miniature. Michaelis adds that things execrable will be around him, He will destroy Rome on account of the Pope, and the Jews will help him. He will resuscitate the dead, and, when thirty, will reign with Lucifer, the seven-headed dragon, and, after a reign of three years, Christ will slay him.

Many such details might be quoted of Antichrist, whose appearance has long been threatened, but with as yet no fulfilment. We must mention, however, a volume published many years ago at Lyons, by Rusand, called, Les Precurseurs de l'Antechrist. This work shows that the reign of Antichrist, if it has not begun, is drawing near; that the philosophers, encyclopedists and revolutionaries of the eighteenth century were naught but demons incarnated to precede and prepare the way for Antichrist. In our own time it has frequently been averred that Antichrist is none other than the ex-Kaiser of Germany.

For a list of all of my digital books click here

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

The History of the Terror Tale by Edith Birkhead M.A. 1921


For more go to 70 Penny Dreadfuls, Gothic Novels and Dime Novels on DVDrom 

Join my Facebook Group

The history of the tale of terror is as old as the history of man. Myths were created in the early days of the race to account for sunrise and sunset, storm-winds and thunder, the origin of the earth and of mankind. The tales men told in the face of these mysteries were naturally inspired by awe and fear. The universal myth of a great flood is perhaps the earliest tale of terror. During the excavation of Nineveh in 1872, a Babylonian version of the story, which forms part of the Gilgamesh epic, was discovered in the library of King Ashurbanipal (668-626 B.C.); and there are records of a much earlier version, belonging to the year 1966 B.C. The story of the Flood, as related on the eleventh tablet of the Gilgamesh epic, abounds in supernatural terror. To seek the gift of immortality from his ancestor, Ut-napishtim, the hero undertakes a weary and perilous journey. He passes the mountain guarded by a scorpion man and woman, where the sun goes down; he traverses a dark and dreadful road, where never man trod, and at last crosses the waters of death. During the deluge, which is predicted by his ancestor, the gods themselves are stricken with fear: "No man beheld his fellow, no more could men know each other. In heaven the gods were afraid...drew back, they climbed up into the heaven of Anu. The gods crouched like dogs, they cowered by the walls." Another episode in the same epic, when Nergal, the god of the dead, brings before Gilgamesh an apparition of his friend, Eabani, recalls the impressive scene, when the witch of Endor summons the spirit of Samuel before Saul.

When legends began to grow up round the names of traditional heroes, fierce encounters with giants and monsters were invented to glorify their strength and prowess. David, with a stone from his sling, slew Goliath. The crafty Ulysses put out the eye of Polyphemus. Grettir, according to the Icelandic saga, overcame Glam, the malevolent, death-dealing vampire who "went riding the roofs." Beowulf fearlessly descended into the turbid mere to grapple with Grendel's mother. Folktales and ballads, in which incidents similar to those in myths and heroic legends occur, are often overshadowed by terror. Figures like the Demon Lover, who bears off his mistress in the fatal craft and sinks her in the sea, and the cannibal bridegroom, outwitted at last by the artfulness of one of his brides, appear in the folk-lore of many lands. Through every century there glide uneasy spirits, groaning for vengeance. Andrew Lang mentions the existence of a papyrus fragment, found attached to a wooden statuette, in which an ancient Egyptian scribe addresses a letter to the Khou, or spirit, of his dead wife, beseeching her not to haunt him. One of the ancestors of the savage were-wolf, who figures in Marryat's Phantom Ship, may perhaps be discovered in Petronius' _Supper of Trimalchio_. The descent of Bram's Stoker's infamous vampire Dracula may be traced back through centuries of legend. Hobgoblin's, demons, and witches mingle grotesquely with the throng of beautiful princesses, queens in glittering raiment, fairies and elves. Without these ugly figures, folk-tales would soon lose their power to charm. All tale tellers know that fear is a potent spell. The curiosity which drove Bluebeard's wife to explore the hidden chamber lures us on to know the worst, and as we listen to horrid stories, we snatch a fearful joy. Human nature desires not only to be amused and entertained, but moved to pity and fear. All can sympathise with the youth, who could not shudder and who would fain acquire the gift.

From English literature we gain no more than brief, tantalising glimpses of the vast treasury of folk-tales and ballads that existed before literature became an art and that lived on side by side with it, vitalising and enriching it continually. Yet here and there we catch sudden gleams like the fragment in King Lear:

"Childe Roland to the dark tower came.
His word was still Fie, Foh and Fum,
I smell the blood of a British man."

or Benedick's quotation from the Robber Bridegroom:

"It is not so, it was not so, but, indeed; God forbid that it should be so,"

which hint at the existence of a hoard as precious and inexhaustible as that of the Nibelungs. The chord of terror is touched in the eerie visit of the three dead sailor sons "in earthly flesh and blood" to the wife of Usher's well, Sweet William's Ghost, the rescue of Tam Lin on Halloween, when Fairyland pays a tiend to Hell, the return of clerk Saunders to his mistress, True
Thomas's ride to Fairyland, when:

"For forty days and forty nights.
He wade through red blood to the knee.
And he saw neither sun nor moon,
But heard the roaring of the sea."

The mediaeval romances of chivalry, which embody stories handed down by oral tradition, are set in an atmosphere of supernatural wonder and enchantment. In Malory's _Morte d'Arthur_, Sir Lancelot goes by night into the Chapel Perilous, wherein there is only a dim light burning, and steals from the corpse a sword and a piece of silk to heal the wounds of a dying knight. Sir Galahad sees a fiend leap out of a tomb amid a cloud of smoke; Gawaine's ghost, with those of the knights and ladies for whom he has done battle in life, appears to warn the king not to begin the fight against Modred on a certain day. In the romance of _Sir Amadas_, the ghost of a merchant, whose corpse the knight had duteously redeemed from the hands of creditors, succours him at need. The shadow of terror lurks even amid the beauty of Spenser's fairyland. In the windings of its forests we come upon dark caves, mysterious castles and huts, from which there start fearsome creatures like Despair or the giant Orgoglio, hideous hags like Occasion, wicked witches and enchanters or frightful beings like the ghostly Maleger, who wore as his helmet a dead man's skull and rode upon a tiger swift as the wind. The Elizabethan dramatists were fascinated by the terrors of the invisible world. Marlowe's Dr. Faustus, round whose name are clustered legends, centuries old concerning bargains between man and the devil, the apparitions and witches in Macbeth, the dead hand, the corpse-like images, the masque of madmen, the tombmaker and the passing-bell in Webster's sombre tragedy. _The Duchess of Malfi_, prove triumphantly the dramatic possibilities of terror. As a foil to his Masque of Queens (1609) Ben Jonson introduced twelve loathly witches with Ate as their leader, and embellished his description of their profane rites, with details culled from James I's treatise on Demonology and from learned ancient authorities. In The Pilgrim's Progress, Despair, who "had as many lives as a cat," his wife Diffidence at Doubting Castle, and Maul and Slaygood are the ogres of popular story, whose acquaintance Bunyan had made in chapbooks during his ungodly youth. Hobgoblins, devils and fiends, "sturdy rogues" like the three brothers Faintheart, Mistrust and Guilt, who set upon Littlefaith in Dead Man's Lane, lend the excitement of terror to Christian's journey to the Celestial City. The widespread belief in witches and spirits to which Browne and Burton and many others bear witness in the seventeenth century, lived on in the eighteenth century, although the attitude of the "polite" in the age of reason was ostensibly incredulous and superior. A scene in one of the Spectator essays illustrates pleasantly the state of popular opinion. Addison, lodging with a good-natured widow in London, returns home one day to find a group of girls sitting by candlelight, telling one another ghost-stories. At his entry they are abashed, but, on the widow's assuring them that it is only the "gentleman," they resume, while Addison, pretending to be absorbed in his book at the far end of the table, covertly listens to their tales of "ghosts that, pale as ashes, had stood at the feet of the bed or walked over a churchyard by moonlight; and others, who had been conjured into the Red Sea for disturbing people's rest." In another essay Addison shows that he is strongly inclined to believe in the existence of spirits, though he repudiates the ridiculous superstitions which prevailed in his day; and Sir Roger de Coverley frankly confesses his belief in witches. Defoe, in the preface to his Essay on the History and Reality of Apparitions (1727) states uncompromisingly: "I must tell you, good people, he that is not able to see the devil, in whatever shape he is pleased to appear in, he is not really qualified to live in this world, no, not in the quality of a common inhabitant." Epworth Rectory, the home of John Wesley's father, was haunted in 1716-17 by a persevering ghost called Old Jeffrey, whose exploits are recorded with a gravity and circumstantial exactitude that remind us of Defoe's narrative concerning the ghostly Mrs. Veal in her "scoured" silk. John Wesley declares stoutly that he is convinced of the literal truth of the story of one Elizabeth Hobson, who professed to have been visited on several occasions by supernatural beings. He upholds too the authenticity of the notorious Drummer of Tedworth, whose escapades are described in chapbooks and in Glanvill's _Sadducismus Triumphatus_ (1666), a book in which he was keenly interested. In his journal (May 25th, 1768) he remarks:

"It is true that the English in general, and indeed most of the men of learning in Europe, have given up all accounts of witches and apparitions, as mere old wives fables. I am sorry for it; and I willingly take this opportunity of entering my solemn protest against this violent compliment which so many that believe the Bible pay to those who do not believe it."

The Cock Lane ghost gained very general credit, and was considered by Mrs. Nickleby a personage of some importance, when she boasted to Miss La Creevy that her great-grandfather went to school with him—or her grandmother with the Thirsty Woman of Tutbury. The appearance of Lord Lyttleton's ghost in 1779 was described by Dr. Johnson, who was also disposed to believe in the Cock Lane ghost, as the most extraordinary thing that had happened in his day. There is abundant evidence that the people of the eighteenth century were extremely credulous, yet, in literature, there is a tendency to look askance at the supernatural as at something wild and barbaric. Such ghosts as presume to steal into poetry are amazingly tame, and even elegant, in their speech and deportment. In Mallet's _William and Margaret_ (1759), which was founded on a scrap of an old ballad out of _The Knight of the Burning Pestle_, Margaret's wraith rebukes her false lover in a long and dignified oration. But spirits were shy of appearing in an age when they were more likely to be received with banter than with dread. Dr. Johnson expresses the attitude of his age when, in referring to Gray's poem, _The Bard_, he remarks: "To select a singular event and swell it to a giant's bulk by fabulous appendages of spectres and predictions has little difficulty, for he that forsakes the probable may always find the marvellous. And it has little use ; we are affected only as we believe; we are improved only as we find something to be imitated or declined." (1780.)

The dictum that we are affected only as we believe is open to grave doubt. We are often thrown into a state of trepidation simply through the power of the imagination; We are wise after the event, like Partridge at the play:

"No, no, sir; ghosts don't appear in such dresses as that neither . . . And if it was really a ghost, it could do one no harm at such a distance, and in so much company; and yet, if I was frightened, I am not the only person."

The supernatural which persisted always in legends handed down from one generation to another on the lips of living people, had not lost its power to thrill and alarm, and gradually worked its way back into literature. Although Gray and Collins do not venture far beyond the bounds of the natural, they were in sympathy with the popular feelings of superstitious terror, and realised how effective they would be in poetry.

Collins, in his _Ode on the Superstitions of the Scottish Highlands_, adjures Home, the author of _Douglas_, to sing:

"how, framing hideous spells.
In Sky's lone isle, the gifted wizard-seer
Lodged in the wintry cave with Fate's fell spear
Or in the depths of Uist's dark forests dwells.
How they whose sight such dreary dreams engross
With their own vision oft astonished droop
When o'er the wintry strath or quaggy moss
They see the gliding ghosts unbodied troop."

Burns, in the foreword to _Halloween_ (1785), writes in the "enlightened" spirit of the eighteenth century, but in the poem itself throws himself whole-heartedly into the hopes and fears that agitate the lovers. He owed much to an old woman who lived in his home in infancy:

"She had . . . the largest collection in the country of tales and songs concerning devils, ghosts, fairies, brownies, witches, warlocks, spunkies, kelpies, elf-candles, dead-lights, wraiths, apparitions, cantraips, giants, enchanted towers, dragons and other trumpery. This cultivated the latent seeds of poetry, but had so strong an effect on my imagination, that to this hour, in my
nocturnal rambles, I sometimes keep a sharp look-out in suspicious places; it often takes an effort of philosophy to shake off these idle terrors."

_Tam o' Shanter_, written for Captain Grose, was perhaps based on a Scottish legend, learnt at the inglenook in childhood, from this old wife, or perhaps

"By some auld houlet-haunted biggin
Or kirk deserted by its riggin,"

from Captain Grose himself, who made to quake:

"Ilk ghaist that haunts auld ha' or chamer.
Ye gipsy-gang that deal in glamor,
And you, deep-read in hell's black grammar.
Warlocks and witches."

In it Burns reveals with lively reality the terrors that assail the reveller on his homeward way through the storm:

"Past the birks and meikle stane
Where drunken Charlie brak's neck-bane;
And through the whins, and by the cairn
Where hunters fand the murdered bairn
And near the thorn, aboon the well
Where Mungo's mither hanged hersell."

For sheer terror the wild, fantastic witch-dance, seen through a Gothic window in the ruins of Kirk-Alloway, with the light of humour strangely glinting through, has hardly been surpassed. The Ballad-collections, beginning with Percy's _Reliques of Ancient English Poetry_ (1765), brought poets back to the original sources of terror in popular tradition, and helped to revive the latent feelings of awe, wonder and fear. In Coleridge's _Ancient Mariner_ the skeleton-ship with its ghastly crew —the spectre-woman and her deathmate—the sensations of the mariner, alone on a wide, wide sea, seize on our imagination with irresistible power. The very substance of the poem is woven of the supernatural. The dream imagery is thrown into relief by occasional touches of reality—the lighthouse, the church on the cliff, the glimpses of the wedding, the quiet song of the hidden brook in the leafy month of June. We, like the mariner, after loneliness so awful that "God himself Scarce seemed there to be,"

welcome the firm earth beneath our feet, and the homely sound of the vesper bell. In _Christabel_ we float dreamily through scenes as unearthly and ephemeral as the misty moonlight, and the words in which Coleridge conjures up his vision fall into music of magic beauty. The opening of the poem creates a sense of foreboding, and the horror of the serpent-maiden is subtly suggested through her effect on Christabel. Coleridge hints at the terrible with artistic reticence. In _Kubla Khan_ the chasm is:

"A savage place! as holy and enchanted
As e'er beneath a waning moon was haunted
By woman wailing for her demon-lover."

The poetry of Keats is often mysterious and suggestive of terror. The description of the Gothic hall in The Eve of St. Agnes:

"In all the house was heard no human sound;
A chain-drooped lamp was flickering by each door;
The arras, rich with horseman, hawk and hound.
Fluttered in the besieging wind's uproar;
And the long carpets rose along the gusty floor;"

the serpent-maiden, Lamia, who

"Seemed at once some penanced lady elf.
Some demon's mistress, or the demon's self;"

the grim story in Isabella of Lorenzo's ghost, who

"Moaned a ghostly undersong
Like hoarse night-gusts sepulchral briers along."

all lead us over the borderland. In a rejected stanza of the Ode on Melancholy, he abandons the horrible:

"Though you should build a bark of dead men's bones
And rear a phantom gibbet for a mast,
Stitch shrouds together for a sail, with groans
To fill it out, blood-stained and aghast;
Although your rudder be a dragon's tail
Long severed, yet still hard with agony,
Your cordage, large uprootings from the skull
Of bald Medusa, certes you would fail
To find the Melancholy—"

Keats's melancholy is not to be found amid images of horror:

"She dwells with Beauty—Beauty that must die"
And Joy, whose hand is ever at his lips
Bidding adieu."

In _La Belle Dame sans Merci_ he conveys with delicate touch the memory of the vision which haunts the knight, alone and palely loitering. We see it through his eyes:

"I saw pale kings and princes too.
Pale warriors, death-pale were they all;
They cried—'La Belle Dame sans Merci
Hath thee in thrall!'

I saw their starv'd lips in the gloam
With horrid warning gaped wide.
And I awoke and found me here.
On the cold hill's side."

From effects so exquisitely wrought as these it seems almost profane to turn to the crude attempts of such poets as "Monk" Lewis or Southey to sound the note of terror. Yet they too, in their fashion, played a part in the "Renascense of Wonder." Coleridge, fascinated by the spirit of "gramarye" in Burger's Lenore, etherealised and refined it. Scott and Lewis gloried in the gruesome  details and spirited rhythm of the ballad, and in their Supernatural poems wish to startle and terrify, not to awe, their readers. Those who revel in phosphorescent lights and in the rattle of the skeleton are apt to o'erleap themselves; and Scott's _Glenfinlas_, Lewis's _Alonzo the Brave and the Fair Imogene_ and Southey's _Old Woman of Berkeley_ fall into the category of the grotesque. Hogg intentionally mingles the comic and the terrible in his poem. _The Witch of Fife_, but his prose stories reveal his power of creating an atmosphere of diablerie, undisturbed by intrusive mockery. In the poem _Kilmeny_, he handles an uncanny theme with dreamy beauty.

From the earliest times to the present day, writers of fiction have realised the force of supernatural terror. In the _Babylonica_ of Iamblichus, the lovers evade their pursuers by passing as spectres; the scene of the romance is laid in tombs, caverns, and robbers' dens, a setting remarkably like that of Gothic story. Into the English novel of the first half of the eighteenth century, however, the ghost dares not venture. The innate desire for the marvellous was met at this period not by the novel, but by oral tradition and by such works as Galland's translation of _The Arabian Nights_, the Countess D'Aulnoy's collection of fairy-tales, Perrault's Contes de ma Mere Oie. Chapbooks setting forth mediaeval legends of "The Wandering Jew," the "Demon Frigate," or "Dr. Faustus," and interspersed with anecdotes of freaks, monsters and murderers, satisfied the craving for excitement among humbler readers. Smollett, who, in his _Adventures of Ferdinand, Count Fathom_ (1753), seems to have been experimenting with new devices for keeping alive the interest of a picaresque novel, anticipates the methods of Mrs. Radcliffe. Although he sedulously avoids introducing the supernatural, he hovers perilously, on the threshold. The publication of The Castle of Otranto in 1764 was not so wild an adventure as Walpole would have his readers believe. The age was ripe for the reception of the marvellous.

The supernatural had, as we have seen, begun to find its way back into poetry, in the work of Gray and Collins. In Macpherson's _Ossian_, which was received with acclamation in 1760-3, the mountains, heaths and lakes are haunted by shadowy, superstitious fears. Dim-seen ghosts wail over the wastes. There is abundant evidence that "authentic" stories of ghostly appearances were heard with respect. Those who eagerly explored Walpole's Gothic castle and who took pleasure in Miss Reeve's well-trained ghost, had previously enjoyed the thrill of chimney-corner legends. The idea of the gigantic apparition was derived, no doubt, from the old legend of the figure seen by Wallace on the field of battle. The limbs, strewn carelessly about the staircase and the gallery of the castle, belong to a giant, very like those who are worsted by the heroes of popular story. Godwin, in an unusual flight of fancy, amused himself by tracing a certain similitude between _Caleb Williams_ and _Bluebeard_, between _Cloudesley_ and _The Babes in the Wood_, and planned a story, on the analogy of the Sleeping Beauty, in which the hero was to have the faculty of unexpectedly falling asleep for twenty, thirty, or a hundred years.

Mrs. Radcliffe, who, so far as we may judge, did not draw her characters from the creatures of flesh and blood around her, seems to have adopted some of the familiar figures of old story. Emily's guardian, Montoni, in _The Mysteries of Udolpho_, like the unscrupulous uncle in Godwin's _Cloudesley_, may well have been descended from the wicked uncle of the folk tale. The cruel stepmother is disguised as a haughty, scheming marchioness in _The Sicilian Romance_. The ogre drops his club, assumes a veneer of polite refinement and relies on the more gentlemanlike method of the dagger and stiletto for gaining his ends. The banditti and robbers who infest the countryside in Gothic fiction are time-honoured figures. Travellers in Thessaly in Apuleius' _Golden Ass_, like the fugitives in Shelley's _Zastrozzi_ and _St. Irvyne_, find themselves in robbers' caves. The Gothic castle, suddenly encountered in a dark forest, is boldly transported from fairyland and set down in Italy, Sicily or Spain. The chamber of horrors, with its alarming array of scalps or skeletons, is civilised beyond recognition and becomes the deserted wing of an abbey, concealing nothing worse than one discarded wife, emaciated and dispirited, but still alive. The ghost-story, which Ludovico reads in the haunted chamber of Udolpho, is described by Mrs. Radcliffe as a Provencal tale, but is in reality common to the folklore of all countries. The restless ghost, who yearns for the burial of his corpse, is as ubiquitous as the Wandering Jew. In the Iliad he appears as the shade of Patroclus, pleading with Achilles for his funeral rites. According to a letter of the younger Pliny, he haunts a house in Athens, clanking his chains. He is found in every land, in every age. His feminine counterpart presented herself to Dickens' nurse requiring her bones, which were under a glass-case, to be "interred with every undertaking solemnity up to twenty-four pound ten, in another particular place." Melmoth the Wanderer, when he becomes the wooer of Immalee, seems almost like a reincarnation of the Demon Lover. The wandering ball of fire that illuminates the dusky recesses of so many Gothic abbeys is but another manifestation of the Fate-Moon, which shines, foreboding death, after Thorgunna's funeral, in the Icelandic saga. The witchcraft and demonology that attracted Scott and "Monk" Lewis, may be traced far beyond Sinclair's _Satan's Invisible World Discovered_(1685), Bovet's _Pandemonium or the Devil's Cloyster Opened_(1683), or Reginald Scot's _Discovery of Witchcraft_(1584) to Ulysses' invocation of the spirits of the dead, to the idylls of Theocritus and to the Hebrew narrative of Saul's visit to the Cave of Endor. There are incidents in _The Golden Ass_ as "horrid" as any of those devised by the writers of Gothic romance. It would, indeed, be no easy task to fashion scenes more terrifying than the
mutilation of Socrates in _The Golden Ass_, by the witch, who tears out his heart and stops the wound with a sponge which falls out when he stoops to drink at a river, or than the strange apparition of a ragged, old woman who vanishes after leading the way to the room, where the baker's corpse hangs behind the door. Though the title assumes a special literary significance at the
close of the eighteenth century, the tale of terror appeals to deeply rooted instincts, and belongs, therefore, to every age and clime.


For a list of all of my digital books click here

The Strange Murder of Hart Northey by William Thomas Stead 1908


The Strange Murder of Hart Northey by William Thomas Stead 1908

See also Warnings Of Peril And Death by William Thomas Stead 1921

"St. Eglos is situated about ten miles from the Atlantic, and not quite so far from the old market town of Trebodwina. Hart and George Northey were brothers, and from childhood their lives had been marked by the strongest brotherly affection. Hart and George Northey had never been separated from their birth until George became a sailor, Hart meantime joining his father in business. On the 8th of February, 1840, while George Northey's ship was lying in port at St. Helena, he had the following strange dream:

"'Last night I dreamt my brother was at Trebodwina Market, and that I was with him, quite close by his side, during the whole of the market transactions. Although I could see and hear everything which passed around me, I felt sure that it was not my bodily presence which thus accompanied him, but my shadow, or rather my spiritual presence, for he seemed quite unconscious that I was near him. I felt that my being thus present in this strange way betokened some hidden danger which he was destined to meet, and which I knew my presence could not avert, for I could not speak to warn him of his peril.'"

See also The Mystery, Interpretation & Psychology of Dreams - 60 Books on Cdrom

The brother having collected considerable money then started on his ride homeward. The story then continues:

"'My terror gradually increased as Hart approached the hamlet of Polkerrow, until I was in a perfect frenzy, frantically desirous, yet unable, to warn my brother in some way and prevent him going further. I suddenly became aware of two dark shadows thrown across the road. I felt my brother's hour had come, and I was powerless to aid him! Two men appeared, whom I instantly recognized as notorious poachers, who lived in a lonely wood near St. Eglos. The men wished him "Good-night," maister," civilly enough. He replied, and entered into conversation with them about some work he had promised them. After a few minutes they asked him for some money. The elder of the two brothers, who was standing near the horse's head, said, "Mr. Northey, we know you have just come from Trebodwina market with plenty of money in your pockets; we are desperate men, and you bean't going to leave this place until we've got that money, so hand over." My brother made no reply, except to slash at him with the whip and spur the horse at him.

"'The younger of the ruffians instantly drew a pistol and fired. Hart dropped lifeless from the saddle, and one of the villains held him by the throat with a grip of iron for some minutes, as though to make assurance doubly sure, and crush out any particle of life my poor brother might have left. The murderers secured the horse to a tree in the orchard, and, having rifled the corpse, they dragged it up the stream, concealing it under the overhanging banks of the water-course. They then carefully covered over all marks of blood on the road, and hid the pistol in the thatch of a disused hut close to the roadside; then, setting the horse free to gallop home alone, they decamped across the country to their own cottage.'

"The vessel left St. Helena next day, and reached Plymouth in due course. George Northey had, during the whole of the voyage home, never altered his conviction that Hart had been killed as he had dreamt, and that retribution was by his means to fall on the murderers."

The sequel shows that the murder was actually committed in precisely the manner in which it had appeared to the brother in the dream. The crime aroused universal horror and indignation, and every effort was made to discover the murderers and bring them to justice. Two brothers named Hightwood were suspected, and a search of their cottage revealed blood-stained garments, but no trace of the pistol was to be found, although the younger brother admitted having had one and lost it. The story continues:

"Both brothers were arrested and brought before the magistrates. The evidence against them was certainly not strong, but their manner seemed that of guilty men. They were ordered to take their trial at the forthcoming assizes at Trebodwina. They each confessed in the hope of saving their lives, and both were sentenced to be hanged. There was, however, some doubt about the pistol. Before the execution George Northey arrived from St. Helena, and declared that the pistol was in the thatch of the old cottage close by the place where they murdered Hart Northey, and where they hid it. 'How did you know?' he was asked. George Northey replied: 'I saw the foul deed committed in a dream I had the night of the murder, when at St. Helena.' A pistol was found, as George Northey had predicted, in the thatch of the ruined cottage."

For a list of all of my disks and digital books, click here

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

The Composition Of The True Cross by Frederick W. Hackwood 1901


The Composition Of The True Cross by Frederick William Hackwood 1901

The composition of the True Cross-or Vera Cruz as the " most catholic" Spaniard calls it-has evidently exercised the minds of a great many devout believers, if one may judge by the number of the legends concerning it.

The Mistletoe, first of all, is said to have been accursed, because of its sour wood was made the cross of Christ. It was then a great forest tree, but on account of this unholy use of its wood it was degraded to a parasite which can only grow upon other trees. For the same reason Mistletoe is always banished from church decorations.

Owing to the mistletoe's connection with the legendary composition of the Cross, many writers of eminence have declared that the "baleful mistletoe" was banished from all church decorations at Christmas. If there were a more valid reason to be assigned for such a neglect, it would probably be in the fact of the mistletoe's association with the Pagan rites of Druidism. But as a matter of fact, the mistletoe, has not always been excluded from the Christmas decorations of a church. The poet Gay calls it the "sacred mistletoe"; and Herrick, referring to the taking down of the Christmas decorations from the church at Candlemas, as already noted on p. 54, says:-

Down with the Mistletoe.

Another legend takes a similar view of the merits of the case. The Oak is blamed for not refusing its services in this great sacrificial rite. We are informed that when the Jews were in search of wood where-with to make the cross, every tree with the exception of the Oak split itself to avoid being desecrated; and the complacent Oak was therefore regarded as accursed.

According to Sir John Maundeville the effect of the World's Tragedy upon all the trees, then in existence, was very peculiar. He says--"A little from Hebron is the Mount of Mamre; and there is an Oak tree which is of Abraham's time, and people call it the Dry Tree. They say it has been there since the beginning of the world, and that it was once green and bore leaves, till the time that Our Saviour died on the cross; and then it died and so did all the trees which were in existence. And there is a prophecy that a lord, a prince of the West side of the world, shall win the Land of the Promise, that is the Holy Land, with the help of Christians; and he shall cause service to be performed under that Dry Tree, and then the tree shall become green and bear both fruit and leaves again."

The quaint names and mysterious properties of the Dry Tree are legion. It is not only called the Arbre Sec, but the Arbre Sol, or Tree of the Sun. Sometimes, indeed, there is the Male Tree of the Sun, and the Female Tree of the Moon. But every one of these oracular trees, in the legends of Christendom, undoubtedly bore some mystic reference to the Cross. The fabulous names have been variously interpreted to indicate the Strawberry tree, Arbutus, Plane tree, Cypress, Mimosa, and what not. Notwithstanding all this, legendary lore often makes the Cross of green wood.

There is another version of the LEGEND OF SETH--to be given presently--which says that Adam had a staff created in the twilight of the approaching Sabbath and bestowed upon him in Paradise. It was handed down to Enoch, and in the line of the patriarchs reached Moses; it having, after the death of Joseph, been set in Jethro's Garden. It was evidently always the same rod of power, destined to form the Cross of Christ.

Sir John Maundeville's Voyages and Travels gives a whole chapter on the Cross and Crown of our Lord Jesus Christ. As to the composition of the Cross, it runs:-

"At Constantinople is the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, and His coat without seams, and the sponge and the reed with which the Jews gave our Lord vinegar and gall on the Cross; and there is one of the nails with which Christ was nailed on the Cross. And some men believe that half the Cross of our Lord is in Cyprus, in an abbey of monks called the Hill of the Holy Cross. But it is not so; for the cross which is in Cyprus is that on which Dismas, the good thief, was crucified.

"And you shall understand that the cross of our Lord was made of four kinds of trees, as is contained in this verse:-

"In cruce fit palma, cedrus, cypressus, oliva."

"For the piece that went upright from the earth to the head was of cypress; and the piece that went across, to which His hands were nailed, was of palm; and the stock that stood within the earth, in which was made the mortise was of cedar; and the tablet above his head, which was a foot and a half long, on which the title was written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin, was of olive.

"And the Jews made the cross of these four kinds of trees, because they believed that our Lord Jesus Christ should have hanged on the cross as long as the cross might last; and therefore they made the foot of the cross of cedar, because cedar may not rot in earth or water; and they thought that it should have lasted long. And because they believed that the Body of Christ should have stunk, therefore they made the piece that went from the earth upwards of cypress, for it is well smelling, so that the smell of His Body should not grieve men that passed by. And the cross piece was of palm, because in the Old Testament it was ordained that when anyone conquered, he should be crowned with palm; and because they believed that they had the victory of Christ Jesus, therefore thev made the cross-piece of palm. And the tablet of the title they made of olive, because olive betokens peace; and the story of Noah witnessed that when the dove brought the branch of olive, it betokened peace made between God and man; and so the Jews expected to have peace when Christ was dead; for they said that He made discord and strife amongst them.

"And you shall understand that our Lord was nailed on the cross in a recumbent position, and, therefore, He suffered the more pain. And the Christians that dwell beyond the sea, in Greece, say that the tree of the cross that we call cypress, was of that tree of which Adam ate the apple, and that they find written. And they say also, that their scripture says that Adam was sick, and told his son, Seth, to go to the angel that kept Paradise, to pray that he should send him the oil of mercy to anoint his members with, that he might have health. And Seth went, but the angel would not let him come in, telling him that he might not have the oil of mercy; but he gave him three grains of the same tree of which his father ate the apple, and bade him, as soon as his father was dead, that he should put these three grains under his tongue, and bury him so; and he did.

"And of these three grains sprung a tree, as the angel said that it should, and bore a fruit, through which fruit Adam should be saved. And when Seth came again, he found his father near dead. And when he was dead, he did with the grains as the angel bade him; of which sprung three trees, whereof the cross was made, that bare good fruit and blessed, namely our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom Adam and all that come of him, should be saved and delivered from dread of death without end, unless it be by their own fault.

"And you shall understand that the cross of our Lord was eight cubits long, and the cross-piece was three cubits and a half in length. And one part of the Crown of our Lord wherewith He was crowned, and one of the nails, and the spear-head, and many other relics, are in France, in the Kings chapel, the crown being placed in a vessel of crystal richly worked. For a king of France bought the relics of the Jews, to whom the emperor had given them in pledge for a great sum of silver."

And now, to give OTHER LEGENDS OF THE TRUE CROSS, with even greater amplitude of detail:

In the work commenced by Mrs. Jameson, and completed by Lady Eastlake, entitled The History of Our Lord as Exemplified in Works of Art (Longmans, 1864), the History of the True Cross is traced at great length by the device of fitting together the various legends of its origin, discovery, and exaltation.

The story begins with Adam, as related by Maundeville. The sickness of Father Adam was felt one day while he was digging in his garden. He was tired with the labour, pain, and cares of this life; so he sent his son, Seth, to the angel guarding the gates of Eden to ask for some of the oil of mercy which God had promised him when he was thrust out of Paradise. The path to the gates was easily discoverable because of the marks of foot-prints, where no grass had ever grown since Adam and Eve had traced their sad way along it. But the angel at the glorious gates would give none of the oil of mercy, saying only after a period of five thousand five hundred years would it be forthcoming; he gave Seth, instead, three seeds of the tree of which Adam had eaten. According to the instructions of the angel, these seeds were put by Seth under the tongue of Adam upon his death, which took place three days after his return. Adam was so willing to die, that he made merry on hearing the message, and now laughed for the first time since his disobedience.

Seth buried Adam in the Vale of Hebron, where three saplings grew from the seeds. These saplings mysteriously united into one, significant of the Holy Trinity. This tree played many great parts; by it "the waters of Marah were sweetened, and with it Moses struck the rock without calling on God. King David transplanted it to his garden at Jerusalem. Solomon cut it down and would have used it in building the Temple, but the workmen were never able to reduce it to the required size; for sometimes it would be too long, and at others too short. After being thrown aside as useless, there came a sibyl, who sat down upon it to rest, when it set fire to her clothing. This woman, Sibylla, then prophecied that the beam should be for the destruction of the Jews; whereupon her hearers flung it into a stream where it at once rose up and formed a bridge for all wayfarers to pass over. When the Queen of Sheba visited Solomon, she recognised its future destination, and refused to walk over it; she knelt down and worshipped it instead. She had been enlightened in a vision, and told Solomon that upon this holy wood should hang the Saviour of all Father's Adam's posterity. Solomon thereupon overlaid it with gold and silver, and placed it over the door of the Temple; his successor, the wicked King Abijah, coveting this precious metal, stript it, and buried the wood to hide his theft. Years after, when the tree of mercy was forgotten, a well was dug near the place in which it was buried. This was the POOL of SlLOAM, whose healing waters are thus accounted for. When the time of the Passion drew near, the tree floated on the surface of the pool; and the Jews seeing it was fit for their purpose, took it and fashioned the Cross of it. So that by it, all Adam's posterity was healed of sin and redeemed from death.

After the crucifixion the Cross was buried, and hidden from men's eyes, for nearly three hundred years.

The Empress HELENA, inspired by a vision, made her pilgrimage to Jerusalem in search of the True Cross. Arrived there with a great train, she assembled all the wise men of the Jews to inquire of them the whereabouts of the Cross. But the wise men were alarmed; becausa one of them, named Judas, had revealed that at the hour in which the Cross came to light, the ancient law and tradition of the Jews should be for ever destroyed. This had been told to him by his father, Simon, whose brother, Stephen, had been stoned for believing in Him Who had been crucified on it.

When, therefore, the wise men professed ignorance, Helena commanded that they should be buried alive. Terrified at this threat, they delivered up Judas, as the one who knew most about the Holy Cross. Not till he had been starved six days and was nearly perishing, did he reveal the secret that the Cross was lying beneath the Temple of Venus, which Hadrian had purposely built on this sacred spot, in mockery of the Christians.

By order of the Empress, the Temple of Venus was destroyed, and every stone taken away. Judas then dug down twenty feet and found three crosses buried there. To discover which was the cross of Christ, Macarius, bishop of Jerusalem, suggested that the dead body of a man, which was being carried past to its burial, should be laid upon each of the three. When laid upon the first and the second, nothing happened; but when laid upon the third, the dead man instantly came to life. He walked away giving thanks for his recovery, while the air rang with the lamentations of the evil spirits whose powers were now overcome by the Cross of Christ.

Judas was baptised, and received the name ot Quiriacus. The Empress, not at first finding the NAILS, prayed for their recovery also; and in answer they at once appeared on the surface of the earth shining like gold.

Half the Cross, Helena left in Jerusalem, and the other half she sent to Constantinople, where her son. Constantine, inserted a part of it into the head of a statue of himself, and the remainder was sent to Rome, where it was deposited in the church of St. Croce, expressly built to receive it.

The Nails were distributed to various places. One was thrown into a whirlpool in the Adriatic, and instantly tranquilised its waters. The second was forged into a bit for the bridle of Constantine's horse, in fulfilment ot the mysterious passage in Zechariah xiv., 20. The third nail was placed in Constantine's crown.

Till the year 615 the Cross remained at Jerusalem, when it was carried away by COSROES, king of Persia. To recover this most precious Christian relic, the Emperor Heraclius roused himself from his indolence, and raised a large army to defy Cosroes. When their armies met the two monarchs decided to settle the matter by single combat. Cosroes was overcome, and refusing to be baptised, was slain. The Holy Cross was carried back to Jerusalem with great rejoicing. Arriving at the city, mounted on horseback, and surrounded by a magnificent retinue, Heraclius was astonished to find no gate, but the WALLS of JERUSALEM miraculously built up against his entry. Learning that it was the sin of pride which was besetting him in wishing to enter that gate in pomp through which Christ, the King of heaven and of earth, had entered barefoot, mounted upon an ass, and in all humility; the Emperor shed tears of repentance, stripped himself not only of royal pomp, but of all his vestments, and lo, the wall opened before him, and he entered into the city in a righteous spirit and a Christian frame of mind.

Whole books have been written on the Wood of the Cross. The LEGEND OF SETH has many VARIATIONS. For instance, when Seth got to the Gates of Paradise for the oil promised to the penitent, he was allowed to put his head inside. There he saw in the midst of Paradise a glorious fountain from which flowed the four rivers. "And over the fountain rose a Great Tree, with vast roots, but bare of bark and leaves." A Great Serpent was coiled about its denuded stem; the upper branches reached to heaven, and bore at the top a new-born wailing infant whose tears went down to hell like the roots of the tree. Then, from the three seeds given to Seth, it is a triple shoot which springs up, of Cedar, Cypress, and Pine, symbolising the blessed Trinity.

These eventually unite into one tree; the tree survives and goes through many adventures connected with scripture history, till it is in due course taken from the Pool of Bethesda to make the Cross of our Lord.

An old couplet runs:-

Nailed were his feet to Cedar, to Palm his hands
Cypress His body bore, title on Olive stands.

The four kinds of wood were supposed to represent the four quarters of the world. They are also called the incorruptible woods. The stem of the Cross was always of Cypress because it would remain sound in both earth and water; for the Jews reckoned that the body of Christ would hang as long as the Cross would last.

Another legend says that the tree used for the Cross was cut down by Solomon, and buried by him on a spot afterwards known as the Pool of Bethesda; that about the time of our Lord's Passion the tree floated on the surface of this lake, where the Jews found it, as in the other version.

Of course, the Aspen has been named as yielding the timber for the Cross:-

Far off in highland wilds 'tis said
(But Truth now laughs at Fancy's lore)
That of this tree the Cross was made
Which erst the Lord of Glory bore
And of that deed its leaves confess
E'er since a troubled consciousness.

That the Aspen furnished the wood of the Cross, and that in consequence the leaves of that tree have trembled ever since, is the Syrian form of the legend in connection with this subject.

The poet thus accuses the Aspen:-

On the morrow stood she trembling
At the awful weight she bore
When the sun in mid-night blackness
Darkened on Judea's shore.

Still, when not a breeze is stirring
When the mist sleeps on the hill
And all other trees are moveless
Stands the Aspen trembling still.

THE INVENTION (OR DISCOVERY) OF THE CROSS.

Maundeville relates the following:-

"The Jews had concealed their Holy Cross in the earth, under a rock of Mount Calvary; and it lay there two hundred years and more, till the time of St. Helena, the mother of Constantine, Emperor of Rome. She was the daughter of King Coel, born in Colchester, who was King of England, which was then called Britain the Greater; the Emperor Constantine took her to wife for her beauty, and had by her Constantine, who was afterwards Emperor of Rome."

It was after this finding of the "true cross" by St. Helena that it became an object of adoration. She conveyed a part of it to Constantinople, and originated the Festival of the Finding (or Invention) of the Cross, which the Roman Church celebrates on May 3rd.

(With the Empress-mother Helena the period of Christian Pilgrim Travel really begins).

The Multiplication Of This Holy Relic was very remarkable. Numberless churches claimed to possess some parts of it; the proof of the genuineness being forthcoming in the miracles it was said to perform. There were indeed many persons who believed that the True Cross could be infinitely divided without decreasing. It was in vain that the Iconoclasts (the "image-breakers" who condemned such worship) attempted to overcome the adoration of the cross.

Is the Bible Infallible? by Rudolph Etzenhouser 1899

IS THE BIBLE INFALLIBLE?

For more go to 175 Books on New Testament Textual Criticism on DVDrom 

and Bible Difficulties and Scripture Contradictions - 130 Books on DVDrom 

At the Methodist Book Concern, No. 150 Fifth Ave., New York City, in I897, 300 Methodist clergymen met to discuss the question, "Is the Bible Infallible?" After the discussion, the vote being called, only Dr. Shaffer voted affirmatively. Dr. Buckley, editor of the Christian Herald, was prominent on the negative.

For a list of all of my digital books and disks click here

Dr. Chas. H. Eaton said of the proceedings: "The denial of the infallibility of the Bible is nothing new. There are very few clergymen who believe in the absolute inerrancy of the Bible. Dr. Buckley has only stated a truism, and taken the position of an intelligent scholar and critic. Any other position is absolutely indefensible. Today the heretic is not the man who takes Dr. Buckley's position, but the man who opposes it."

Dr. Lyman Abbott said: "The action of the Methodist ministers in disavowing belief in the infallibility of the Bible as it stands in the English version, does not surprise me."

Bishop John H. Vincent, D.D., LL.D., in a lecture during the Methodist conference held at Marion, Iowa, and which adjourned October 10, I898, said: "The sun is not without spots, and these have
their advantages; so with the Bible, it will be revised again and again, but will be more precious in a thousand years than now. We have the book, and we must recognize the possibilities of human errors."

Dupin, in his "Complete History of the Canon and Writers of the Books of the Old and New Testament," Vol. 2, page 108, says of Jerome's work: "When we translated the Hebrew words into Latin we are sometimes guided by conjecture."

Again:
"In short we must confess that there are many differences betwixt the Hebrew text and the version of the Septuagint which arise from the corruption and confusion that are in the Greek version we now have. It is certain that it hath been revised divers times, and that several authors have taken liberty to add thereunto, to retrench and correct divers things."

A statement from "The Corruptions of the New Testament," by H. L. Hastings, reproduced in the Herald and Presbyter of October 16, 1865, is:

"The word of God as it came from him is pure and uncorrupted. But in the long process of years there have come in, by the mistakes of copyists and translators, lapses from this word."

A. Campbell in debate with Owen, page 141, says:

"There are a thousand historic facts narrated in the Bible which it would be absurd to regard as immediate and direct revelation from the Almighty."

The editor of the Christian Evangelist, in Vol. 29, page 802, says: "That there are historical and chronological errors in our present Bible no intelligent and candid person will deny. That some of these errors are the result of copying, is probably true; but that they all so resulted, and that the original autographs were absolutely free from error in all minor details is what no man on earth knows or can prove, as the manuscripts are not in existence."

A. Campbell, in preface to his translation, says: "But some are so wedded to the common version that the very defects in it have become sacred; and an effort, however well intended, to put them in possession of one incomparably superior in propriety, perspicuity and elegance, is viewed very much in the light of making 'a new Bible,' or of 'altering and amending the very word of God.'"

A late work, "The Twentieth Century New Testament," by twenty scholars, the result of toil, is in existence, the purpose in its production being to put into modern or current English the New Testament. Not to translate or revise, but say the same thing in present terms. It is rated by various journals all the way from "just the thing" to a "desecration." One statement of comment characterizing it "almost an insult," and referring to the Revised Version as an utter failure. See Literary Digest, March 25, 1899, page 346.

Agitation proposing editing the Bible is now the order, in order to eliminate such features as Red Sea being divided; the burning bush; water from the rock; Joshua's sun and moon story; that of the fiery furnace; also of the lion's den and all similar narratives.

The Ram's Horn recently presented this in cartoon: A man "removing the supernatural from the Bible." All about his feet lay everything from Genesis to Revelation, the binding remained in his hand. What shall we have next to improve the Bible?
R. ETZENHOUSER.
July 5, 1899.

For a list of all of my disks, with links click here

Immanuel Kant on the Fire Prophecy of Swedenborg, by William White 1874

Immanuel Kant on the Fire Vision of Swedenborg, by William White 1874

See also The Wisdom of Emanuel Swedenborg - 70 Books on DVDrom

For a list of all of my disks, with links click here

On the 19th of July, 1759, we find Swedenborg at Gottenburg. Here occurred the following circumstance, of which Immanuel Kant, the celebrated transcendentalist, is the narrator.

"On Saturday, at 4 o'clock, P. M.," says Kant, "when Swedenborg arrived at Gottenburg from England, Mr. William Castel invited him to his house, together with a party of fifteen persons. About 6 o'clock, Swedenborg went out, and after a short interval returned to the company, quite pale and alarmed. He stated that a dangerous fire had just broken out in Stockholm, at Sundermalm, (distant three hundred miles from Gottenburg,) and that it was spreading very fast. He was restless, and went out often. He said that the house of one of his friends, whom he named, was already in ashes, and that his own was in danger. At 8 o'clock, after he had been out again, he joyfully exclaimed: 'Thank God! the fire is extinguished the third door from my house.' This news occasioned great commotion among the company. It was announced to the governor the same evening. The next morning, Swedenborg was sent for by the governor, who questioned him concerning the disaster. Swedenborg described the fire precisely, how it had begun, in what manner it had ceased, and how long it had continued. On the same day the news was spread through the city; and as the governor had thought it worthy of attention, the consternation was considerably increased, as many were in trouble on account of their friends and property, which might have been involved in the disaster. On Monday evening, a messenger arrived at Gottenburg, who was despatched during the time of the fire. In the letters brought by him, the fire was described precisely in the manner stated by Swedenborg. On Tuesday morning, a royal courier arrived at the governor's with the melancholy intelligence of the fire, of the loss it had occasioned, and of the houses damaged and ruined, not in the least differing from that which Swedenborg had given the moment it had ceased: the fire had been extinguished at 8 o'clock.

"What," continues Kant, "can be brought forward against the authenticity of this occurrence? My friend who wrote this to me, has not only examined the circumstances of this extraordinary case at Stockholm, but also, about two months ago, at Gottenburg, where he is acquainted with the most respectable houses, and where he could obtain the most authentic and complete information, as the greatest part of the inhabitants, who are still alive, were witnesses to the memorable occurrence."

This narrative is taken from a letter written by Kant, in 1768, to Charlotte de Knobloch, a lady of quality. Kant, it may be remarked, was no adherent of Swedenborg's. Two years before writing this letter, he had attacked him in a small work entitled, "Dreams of the Great Seer Illustrated by Dreams of Metaphysics." Received from such a source, we can entertain no doubt as to the truth of the story.

Join my Facebook Group