Wednesday, August 21, 2019

The Timelessness of Literature (1842 Article)


What is Reading & Writing and What are the Advantages Likely to Accrue from a Knowledge Thereof, by Henry Mayhew

From: The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction, Saturday March 26, 1842

WRITING is the act of describing certain figures symbolical of the sounds used by Man, as signs to convey his sensations, thoughts, and emotions, to others; reading, the act of translating those figures into the sounds of which they are the symbols. What miracles are wrought in our simplest acts! How vulgar, and yet how marvellous, is writing! or “putting down words upon paper,” as it is commonly called—words! which are without form and substance! impalpable as moonshine! thoughts wrapt in air! ethereal couriers from mind to mind! volatile as lightning! short-lived as an instant! and yet we transfix them, drag them from the air of which they are part, nail the very breath to paper, and render that which is by nature as transient as time, as permanent as space; giving figure to what the wildest imagination cannot conceive to be figured; sketching sound; making the voice visible, and the eye to hear. It is the distillation of thought! Even as we write, our mind runs liquid through our pen; the very ink grows eloquent, discoursing like the waters of a brook as it flows along the page; the quill (the sage's tongue) speaks like a living thing, and the clear paper mirrors each thought, as it flits across our brain, as a lake reflects each cloud that traverses the sky. Consummate art! that can give mind to matter, sense to the insensate. The dull sheet lies before us, blank as an infant's brain A few magic marks are made upon its surface, and lo! it lives, it feels, it thinks! A human intellect speaks from out it; the mind is painted on it like a landscape; idea after idea glides pictured before our eyes; the diorama of thought— of thought, which (to use the words of D'Alembert) “sees so many things so distant, and yet cannot see itself which is so near.”

Nor is the act of reading a whitless wonderful. We glance at a few fantastic figures, and the inmost recesses of another's soul are instantly revealed to us; the secret processes of his mind are laid bare to us, like so much clockwork: we see him think, and look, as it were, into his very conscience. We cast our eye along a series of grotesque ciphers, and lo! the absent are with us; the past becomes the present; the dead are brought to life. Space melts, and Time rolls backward: Death no longer kills. One word, and the gates of the grave are flung back, and the long-deceased start into life, as did Lazarus of old when Jesus spoke. See! here is what we call a book: what is it really—in itself—physically, what but a collection of sundry scraps of paper, tattooed with curious characters? Has it soul, voice, intellect, imagination? No! it is a dull lump of senseless matter—barren as so much granite—thoughtless as the rags from which it sprang. What is it mentally? What, when looked upon by those skilled in its magic mysteries? he works of William Shakespeare! the heart's historian: nature's evangelist It is the sacred urn treasuring that part of him which could never die—the mausoleum of his immortal mind. To lift back the cover is, as it were, to roll the stone from before the sepulchre, and to see him rise again in all his native glory. These leaves are but the scented cerements embalming his most precious fancy—these characters but so many mystic symbols telling of his high nobility. Here is a page covered with strange ciphers (ciphers which are in themselves only little lines of ink), and yet which, contemplated by the mind, become a garden of most beauteous flowers, in which dwell fairies, honey fragrance, and all the rosy riches of luxurious imagination. Cast but the eye on this, and you shall think as he thought, feel as he felt, dream as he dreamt, two hundred years ago. His spirit shall be with yours, and yours with his, mingling like two rivers. You shall fly with him beyond all space, and look into the bright world of fancy; you shall see with him the springs and movements of the human heart, even as you have, by similar means, seen with Newton the springs and movements of the planets. And yet what is there to connect us living with him dead? What but these mystic characters, and that wonderful little orb, the eye? These are the links which bind him to us—these the spells which can win him back to life and song, though the hand and all of him that penned them be crumbled into dust: nay, though part of that very dust be clinging, as if in fond remembrance, around the pages that it glorified.

“That system of perpetual transmigration, which was but a fable, as believed by Pythagoras, becomes reality,” it has been happily remarked, “when applied to the soul and its feelings in connexion with literature. This is indeed the true metempsychosis by which the poet and the sage spread their conceptions and emotions from breast to breast; and so may be said to extend their existence through an ever-changing immortality.” [Dr. Brown's Lectures.] That strange illusion, the mirror of ink, of which travellers in Egypt speak with so much wonder, and which, on being looked into, presents to the sight the apparition of whomsoever the Magi may command, is no longer a juggle, as shewn in that most common and yet most amazing of all arts, reading. There truly is the ink a magic mirror, in which we have but to look, not only to behold the form, but to hear the voice, nay, to imbibe the very passions of those whom the wizard writer would conjure to our view. In this the mother sees and listens to her absent child; in this, the lover gazes once more upon the darling features of her whom fate has severed from his sight; in this, the lonely widow looks, and hears again the kindly counsellings of him whose voice the grave has hushed; and, poring into this, the student sits and communes with the glorious dead, while the long train of past events, in shadowy procession, sweep before his eyes.

Such is the nature—the extraordinary nature, of those ordinary arts, reading and writing; nor are the advantages accruing from a knowledge of them of a less emiment or less surprising quality. These remain to be set forth. The principal, if not the sole benefit arising from an acquaintance with those arts, consists in the removal of the obstructions which space and time present to the communication, vivá voce, of our thoughts and feelings to others. Speech is not only transient, but limited in its influence. It is a necessary evil attendant upon oral intercourse, that those to whom we speak must be both co-existent and contiguous. By the introduction of literary communion that evil has been remedied; and we are now able, by reading or writing, to transfer our sensations, thoughts, and emotions to others, or to have them transferred to us, though there be the distance of half the earth, or that more formidable barrier, the grave, existing between us. By the gift of speech man was eminently fitted to enjoy that social state which his philanthropy led him to desire; but, by the nature of that gift, not only was the extent of the society, but the term of the enjoyment of it, restricted to narrow limits. By the invention of the arts of reading and writing, these shackles have been cast off, and man (no longer fettered in his desire for communion with his fellow man) has become, as has been beautifully said, “the citizen of every country, the contemporary of every age.” By these simple, but glorious arts, the whole civilized globe has been drawn as it were into one family circle, and a companionship created between those even whom seas divide.

We hear much of the great benefits which our present facilities for local intercommunication have conferred upon mankind. Thus, indeed, has the distance which estranges man from man been abridged, and thus the whole human race have been made neighbours, if not kindred. By these means the blessings of each particular country have been rendered common to all, and the treasures of the most distant lands brought within the reach of the humblest individual in our own. Thus the person of our very pauper is clothed with cotton from the South; his morning meal cheered with tea from the East, sweetened with sugar from the West; while his winter's evenings are illumined with the combustion of the produce of the North. Such are the blessings of our improved means of intercommunication. Ships are fitted out, and the remotest corners of the earth explored, to add to the pleasures even of the poorest amongst us. But eminent as are these benefits, how insignificant do they appear in contrast with those accruing from the arts which we at present contemplate. The same facilities as the steam-engine and the railroad have afforded to the interchange of commodities, have been given by reading and writing to the interchange of thought. Steam only abridges space, whereas literature annihilates it altogether. By the former we can cross the Atlantic (great marvell) in a fortnight; by the latter, we can listen to the philanthropic eloquence of the wise and good Channing (greater marvel still!) without crossing it at all. What, though by the power of the one we can traverse the earth in half the time, can we not, by the magic of the other, sail round the world with Cook, and yet not stir from our seat; or follow Parry to the icy regions of the pole, while sitting by our fire-side; or visit with Park the burning plains of Africa, while our breath freezes on the window-panes at home? What, though the former has brought within the reach of even the humblest amongst us the produce of the richest and most distant quarters of the globe, has not the latter (as it has been truly observed) “given to all who will faithfully use it, the society, the spiritual presence of the greatest and best of our race? No matter how poor I am” (says he, whose writings are in themselves a brilliant instance of the blessings of this noble art),” “no matter though the prosperous of my own time will not enter my obscure dwelling; if the sacred writers will come in and take up their abode with me, if Milton will cross my threshold to sing to me of Paradise, and Shakespeare to open to me the worlds of imagination and the workings of the human heart, and Franklin to enrich me with his practical wisdom, I shall not pine for intellectual companionship, and I may become a cultivated man, though excluded from what is called “the best society’ of the place where I reside.” [Dr Channing on Self Culture]

Another great benefit arising from literary communication is, that the mind has, by these means, become, like our manufactures, capable of exportation. We wrap up our thoughts in a sheet of paper, and transmit them, like a bale of goods, to some far distant land. Our ships are laden not only with the bounty of our soil and the produce of our factories, but with the workings of our brains and the outpourings of our hearts. Scarce a vessel quits our shores that has not its cargo of hopes and fears; of love, sympathy, and counsel; of golden dreams and penniless despair, as well as iron, cotton, and other articles of commerce. Nay, by the happy invention of literature, the very mind has become an article of commerce; and intellect as much a matter of merchandise as cotton and iron themselves. Beautiful and noble thoughts are to be had for money now-a-days, as well as food and raiment. Indeed, for a few pence we may become the possessors of the practical philosophy of Franklin, the gorgeous fancy of Shakespeare, and the silver-toned philanthropy of Channing. Yea, for the matter of a penny a week, we may have our choice of a variety of large sheets, rich in the wonders of the heavens and the earth, and studded with the reflections and actions of the best and wisest of mankind.

But, perhaps, the grandest of all the benefits resulting from a knowledge of reading and writing, lies in the influence which those arts give us over time. By their means, the dark doom of oblivion seems to be annulled, and the changeful and evanescent course of nature rendered immutable and indestructible as truth. Thus, thought (the most volatile of all things in this most volatile world!) has become fixed as fate; and thus that strange, ubiquitous, little point of existence which we call the present; that breadthless line, dividing what has been from what will be; that unsubstantial key-stone to the broad arch of time; that ever-shifting centre of eternity, which no sooner is than it was, has been rescued from the clutches of the past. By these simple arts we are enabled not only to dam up, as it were, the current of events, but to drive back the tide of that mighty principle whose very essence is progression. By literature, that which was even as by science, that which will be — is. Nature stops. There is no past. The thoughts which were present to the mind of Plato two thousand years ago, are now, and, so long as the art endures, shall ever be present to the minds of the existing generation. “It is this permanent transmission of thought which" (it has been truly said) “constitutes the noblest of all the benefits conferred by literary art, giving as it does to each individual the collective powers and wisdom of his species—or rather, giving to every one who desires it, the rich inheritance of the accumulated acquisitions of all the multitudes who, like himself, have, in every preceding age, inquired, meditated, and patiently discovered; or who, by the happy inspiration of genius, have found truths which they scarcely sought, and penetrated with the rapidity of a single glance, those depths of nature which the weak steps and the dim torchlight of generation after generation had vainly laboured to explore.” [Dr. Brown’s Lectures.] Nor is this all. It is this permanent transmission of thought which gives us the power of extending our existsince, as it were, through all the ages which have preceded us, and enjoying the communion of the noblest minds with which those ages were adorned. “We are often in the habit,” says Seneca, in his Treatise on the Shortness of Life, “of complaining that our parents, and all the circumstances of our birth, are not of our choice, but of our fortune. We have it in our power, however, to be born as we please in this second birth of genius. Of the illustrious minds that have preceded us, we have only to determine to whom we wish to be allied, and we are already adopted, not to the inheritance of his mere name, but to the nobler inheritance of his wisdom and his genius.”—What to Teach and How to Teach it.

For a list of all of my classic digital books on disk click here

Thursday, August 8, 2019

The Dead Hand in Ancient Irish Medicine

From Ancient Cures, Charms and Usages of Ireland by Lady Wilde

To obtain the power and secrets of witchcraft, it is necessary to visit a churchyard at midnight, and cut off the hand of a recently buried corpse with your own hand. This is preserved by drying or smoking, and can then be used with great and fatal effect. Old women are known as the strongest tools of the devil, and as having the most fatal powers of witchcraft. These witch-women are recognised at once by their glittering eyes and long, skeleton fingers ; and if they have a dead hand in their possession, their influence is irresistible.

If a witch-woman overlooks a beautiful child, it is doomed to die. If she overlooks the churn, the butter will be carried off to her own churn, though she has nothing but water in it. Beware of her.
When she enters the place, put a red coal under the churn, and tie a branch of the rowan tree on the child's cradle, and a red string on the cow's tail then they are safe. Every one who enters while churning is going on should take a turn with the dash, and say: "God bless the work;" but a witch- woman dare not say the words; therefore, if she refuses, she is known at once to be fatal and unlucky.

Stroking by the hand of a dead man can cure many diseases. It has also the power to bring butter to the churn, if the milk is stirred round nine times with it while a witch-prayer is recited. But many awful things must be done, and evil rites practised, before the witch-words can be learned and uttered.

For a list of all of my digital books and disks click here

Sunday, August 4, 2019

The Story of the Rippling Train: A True Ghost Story


By Mary Louisa Molesworth 1888

"Let's tell ghost stories, then," said Gladys.

"Aren't you tired of them? One hears nothing else nowadays. And they're all 'authentic,' really vouched for, only you never see the person who saw or heard or felt the ghost. It is always somebody's sister or cousin, or friend's friend," objected young Mrs. Snowdon, another of the guests at the Quarries.

"I don't know that that is quite a reasonable ground for discrediting them en masse," said her husband. "It is natural enough, indeed inevitable, that the principal or principals in such cases should be much more rarely come across than the stories themselves. A hundred people can repeat the story, but the author, or rather hero, of it, can't be in a hundred places at once. You don't disbelieve in any other statement or narrative merely because you have never seen the prime mover in it?"

"But I didn't say I discredited them on that account," said Mrs. Snowdon. "You take one up so, Archie. I'm not logical and reasonable; I don't pretend to be. If I meant anything, it was that a ghost story would have a great pull over other ghost stories if one could see the person it happened to. One does get rather provoked at never coming across him or her," she added a little petulantly.

She was tired; they were all rather tired, for it was the first evening since the party had assembled at the large country house known as "the Quarries" on which there was not to be dancing, with the additional fatigue of "ten miles there and ten back again"; and three or four evenings of such doings without intermission tell even on the young and vigorous.

To-night various less energetic ways of passing the evening had been proposed,—music, games, reading aloud, recitation,—none had found favour in everybody's sight, and now Gladys Lloyd's proposal that they should "tell ghost stories" seemed likely to fall flat also.

For a moment or two no one answered Mrs. Snowdon's last remarks. Then, somewhat to everybody's surprise, the young daughter of the house turned to her mother.

"Mamma," she said, "don't be vexed with me—I know you warned me once to be careful how I spoke of it; but wouldn't it be nice if Uncle Paul would tell us his ghost story? And then, Mrs. Snowdon," she went on, "you could always say you had heard one ghost story at or from—which should I say?—headquarters."

Lady Denholme glanced round half nervously before she replied.

"Locally speaking, it would not be at headquarters, Nina," she said. "The Quarries was not the scene of your uncle's ghost story. But I almost think it is better not to speak about it—I am not sure that he would like it mentioned, and he will be coming in a moment. He had only a note to write."

"I do wish he would tell it to us," said Nina regretfully. "Don't you think, mamma, I might just run to the study and ask him, and if he did not like the idea he might say so to me, and no one would seem to know anything about it? Uncle Paul is so kind—I'm never afraid of asking him any favour."

"Thank you, Nina, for your good opinion of me; you see there is no rule without exceptions; listeners do sometimes hear pleasant things of themselves," said Mr. Marischal, as he at that moment came round the screen which half concealed the doorway. "What is the special favour you were thinking of asking me?"

Nina looked rather taken aback.

"How softly you opened the door, Uncle Paul," she said. "I would not have spoken of you if I had known you were there."

"But after all you were saying no harm," observed her brother Michael. "And for my part I don't believe Uncle Paul would mind our asking him what we were speaking of."

"What was it?" asked Mr. Marischal. "I think, as I have heard so much, you may as well tell me the whole."

"It was only——" began Nina, but her mother interrupted her.

"I have told Nina not to speak of it, Paul," she said anxiously; "but—it was only that all these young people are talking about ghost stories, and they want you to tell them your own strange experience. You must not be vexed with them."

"Vexed!" said Mr. Marischal, "not in the least." But for a moment or two he said no more, and even pretty, spoilt Mrs. Snowdon looked a little uneasy.

"You shouldn't have persisted, Nina," she whispered.

Mr. Marischal must have had unusually quick ears. He looked up and smiled.

"I really don't mind telling you all there is to hear," he said. "At one time I had a sort of dislike to mentioning the story, for the sake of others. The details would have led to its being recognised—and it might have been painful. But there is no one now living to whom it would matter—you know," he added, turning to his sister; "her husband is dead too."

Lady Denholme shook her head.

"No," she said, "I did not hear."

"Yes," said her brother, "I saw his death in the papers last year. He had married again, I believe. There is not now, therefore, any reason why I should not tell the story, if it will interest you," he went on, turning to the others. "And there is not very much to tell. Not worth making such a preamble about. It was—let me see—yes, it must be nearly fifteen years ago."

"Wait a moment, Uncle Paul," said Nina. "Yes, that's all right, Gladys. You and I will hold each other's hands, and pinch hard if we get very frightened."

"Thank you," Miss Lloyd replied. "On the whole I should prefer for you not to hold my hand."

"But I won't pinch you so as to hurt," said Nina reassuringly; "and it isn't as if we were in the dark."

"Shall I turn down the lamps?" asked Mr. Snowdon.

"No, no," exclaimed his wife.

"There really is nothing frightening—scarcely even 'creepy,' in my story at all," said Mr. Marischal, half apologetically. "You make me feel like an impostor."

"Oh no, Uncle Paul, don't say that. It is all my fault for interrupting," said Nina. "Now go on, please. I have Gladys's hand all the same," she added sotto voce, "it's just as well to be prepared."

"Well, then," began Mr. Marischal once more, "it must be nearly fifteen years ago; and I had not seen her for fully ten years before that again! I was not thinking of her in the least; in a sense I had really forgotten her: she had quite gone out of my life; that has always struck me as a very curious point in the story," he added parenthetically.

"Won't you tell us who 'she' was, Uncle Paul?" asked Nina half shyly.

"Oh yes, I was going to do so. I am not skilled in story-telling, you see. She was, at the time I first knew her—at the only time, indeed, that I knew her—a very sweet and attractive girl, named Maud Bertram. She was very pretty—more than pretty, for she had remarkably regular features—her profile was always admired, and a tall and graceful figure. And she was a bright and happy creature too; that, perhaps, was almost her greatest charm. You will wonder—I see the question hovering on your lips, Miss Lloyd, and on yours too, Mrs. Snowdon—why, if I admired her and liked her so much, I did not go further. And I will tell you frankly that I did not because I dared not. I had then no prospect of being able to marry for years to come, and I was not very young. I was already nearly thirty, and Maud was quite ten years younger. I was wise enough and old enough to realise the situation thoroughly, and to be on my guard."

"And Maud?" asked Mrs. Snowdon.

"She was surrounded by admirers; it seemed to me then that it would have been insufferable conceit to have even asked myself if it could matter to her. It was only in the light of after events that the possibility of my having been mistaken occurred to me. And I don't even now see that I could have acted otherwise——" Here Uncle Paul sighed a little. "We were the best of friends. She knew that I admired her, and she seemed to take a frank pleasure in its being so. I had always hoped that she really liked and trusted me as a friend, but no more. The last time I saw her was just before I started for Portugal, where I remained three years. When I returned to London Maud had been married for two years, and had gone straight out to India on her marriage, and except by some few friends who had known us both intimately, I seldom heard her mentioned. And time passed. I cannot say I had exactly forgotten her, but she was not much or often in my thoughts. I was a busy and much-absorbed man, and life had proved a serious matter to me. Now and then some passing resemblance would recall her to my mind—once especially when I had been asked to look in to see the young wife of one of my cousins in her court-dress; something in her figure and bearing brought back Maud to my memory, for it was thus, in full dress, that I had last seen her, and thus perhaps, unconsciously, her image had remained photographed on my brain. But as far as I can recollect at the time when the occurrence I am going to relate to you happened, I had not been thinking of Maud Bertram for months. I was in London just then, staying with my brother, my eldest brother, who had been married for several years, and lived in our own old town-house in —— Square. It was in April, a clear spring day, with no fog or half-lights about, and it was not yet four o'clock in the afternoon—not very ghost-like circumstances, you will admit. I had come home early from my club—it was a sort of holiday-time with me just then for a few weeks—intending to get some letters written which had been on my mind for some days, and I had sauntered into the library, a pleasant, fair-sized room lined with books, on the first-floor. Before setting to work I sat down for a moment or two in an easy-chair by the fire, for it was still cool enough weather to make a fire desirable, and began thinking over my letters. No thought, no shadow of a thought of my old friend Miss Bertram was present with me; of that I am perfectly certain. The door was on the same side of the room as the fireplace; as I sat there, half facing the fire, I also half faced the door. I had not shut it properly on coming in—I had only closed it without turning the handle—and I did not feel surprised when it slowly and noiselessly swung open, till it stood right out into the room, concealing the actual doorway from my view. You will perhaps understand the position better if you think of the door as just then acting like a screen to the doorway. From where I sat I could not have seen any one entering the room till he or she had got beyond the door itself. I glanced up, half expecting to see some one come in, but there was no one; the door had swung open of itself. For the moment I sat on, with only the vague thought passing through my mind, 'I must shut it before I begin to write.'


"But suddenly I found my eyes fixing themselves on the carpet; something had come within their range of vision, compelling their attention in a mechanical sort of way. What was it?

"'Smoke,' was my first idea. 'Can there be anything on fire?' But I dismissed the notion almost as soon as it suggested itself. The something, faint and shadowy, that came slowly rippling itself in as it were beyond the dark wood of the open door, was yet too material for 'smoke.' My next idea was a curious one. 'It looks like soapy water,' I said to myself; 'can one of the housemaids have been scrubbing, and upset a pail on the stairs?' For the stair to the next floor almost faced the library door. But—no; I rubbed my eyes and looked again; the soapy water theory gave way. The wavy something that kept gliding, rippling in, gradually assumed a more substantial appearance. It was—yes, I suddenly became convinced of it—it was ripples of soft silken stuff, creeping in as if in some mysterious way unfolded or unrolled, not jerkily or irregularly, but glidingly and smoothly, like little wavelets on the sea-shore.

"And I sat there and gazed. 'Why did you not jump up and look behind the door to see what it was?' you may reasonably ask. That question I cannot answer. Why I sat still, as if bewitched, or under some irresistible influence, I cannot tell, but so it was.

"And it—came always rippling in, till at last it began to rise as it still came on, and I saw that a figure—a tall, graceful woman's figure—was slowly advancing, backwards of course, into the room, and that the waves of pale silk—a very delicate shade of pearly gray I think it must have been—were in fact the lower portion of a long court-train, the upper part of which hung in deep folds from the lady's waist. She moved in—I cannot describe the motion, it was not like ordinary walking or stepping backwards—till the whole of her figure and the clear profile of her face and head were distinctly visible, and when at last she stopped and stood there full in my view just, but only just beyond the door, I saw—it came upon me like a flash—that she was no stranger to me, this mysterious visitant! I recognised, unchanged it seemed to me since the day, ten years ago, when I had last seen her, the beautiful features of Maud Bertram."

Mr. Marischal stopped a moment. Nobody spoke. Then he went on again.

"I should not have said 'unchanged.' There was one great change in the sweet face. You remember my telling you that one of my girl-friend's greatest charms was her bright sunny happiness—she never seemed gloomy or depressed or dissatisfied, seldom even pensive. But in this respect the face I sat there gazing at was utterly unlike Maud Bertram's. Its expression, as she—or 'it'—stood there looking, not towards me, but out beyond, as if at some one or something outside the doorway, was of the profoundest sadness. Anything so sad I had never seen in a human face, and I trust I never may. But I sat on, as motionless almost as she, gazing at her fixedly, with no desire, no power perhaps, to move or approach more nearly to the phantom. I was not in the least frightened. I knew it was a phantom, but I felt paralysed, and as if I myself had somehow got outside of ordinary conditions. And there I sat—staring at Maud, and there she stood, gazing before her with that terrible, unspeakable sadness in her face, which, even though I felt no fear, seemed to freeze me with a kind of unutterable pity.

"I don't know how long I had sat thus, or how long I might have continued to sit there, almost as if in a trance, when suddenly I heard the front-door bell ring. It seemed to awaken me. I started up and glanced round, half-expecting that I should find the vision dispelled. But no; she was still there, and I sank back into my seat just as I heard my brother coming quickly upstairs. He came towards the library, and seeing the door wide open walked in, and I, still gazing, saw his figure pass through that of the woman in the doorway as you may walk through a wreath of mist or smoke—only, don't misunderstand me, the figure of Maud till that moment had had nothing unsubstantial about it. She had looked to me, as she stood there, literally and exactly like a living woman—the shade of her dress, the colour of her hair, the few ornaments she wore, all were as defined and clear as yours, Nina, at the present moment, and remained so, or perhaps became so again as soon as my brother was well within the room. He came forward addressing me by name, but I answered him in a whisper, begging him to be silent and to sit down on the seat opposite me for a moment or two. He did so, though he was taken aback by my strange manner, for I still kept my eyes fixed on the door. I had a queer consciousness that if I looked away it would fade, and I wanted to keep cool and see what would happen. I asked Herbert in a low voice if he saw nothing, but though he mechanically followed the direction of my eyes, he shook his head in bewilderment. And for a moment or two he remained thus. Then I began to notice that the figure was growing less clear, as if it were receding, yet without growing smaller to the sight; it grew fainter and vaguer, the colours grew hazy. I rubbed my eyes once or twice with a half idea that my long watching was making them misty, but it was not so. My eyes were not at fault—slowly but surely Maud Bertram, or her ghost, melted away, till all trace of her had gone. I saw again the familiar pattern of the carpet where she had stood and the objects of the room that had been hidden by her draperies—all again in the most commonplace way, but she was gone, quite gone.

"Then Herbert, seeing me relax my intense gaze, began to question me. I told him exactly what I have told you. He answered, as every "common-sensible" person of course would, that it was strange, but that such things did happen sometimes and were classed by the wise under the head of 'optical delusions.' I was not well, perhaps, he suggested. Been over-working? Had I not better see a doctor? But I shook my head. I was quite well, and I said so. And perhaps he was right, it might be an optical delusion only. I had never had any experience of such things.

"'All the same,' I said, 'I shall mark down the date.'

"Herbert laughed and said that was what people always did in such cases. If he knew where Mrs. —— then was he would write to her, just for the fun of the thing, and ask her to be so good as to look up her diary, if she kept one, and let us know what she had been doing on that particular day—'the 6th of April, isn't it?' he said—when I would have it her wraith had paid me a visit. I let him talk. It seemed to remove the strange painful impression—painful because of that terrible sadness in the sweet face. But we neither of us knew where she was, we scarcely remembered her married name! And so there was nothing to be done—except, what I did at once in spite of Herbert's rallying, to mark down the day and hour with scrupulous exactness in my diary.

"Time passed. I had not forgotten my strange experience, but of course the impression of it lessened by degrees till it seemed more like a curious dream than anything more real, when one day I did hear of poor Maud again. 'Poor' Maud I cannot help calling her. I heard of her indirectly, and probably, but for the sadness of her story, I should never have heard it at all. It was a friend of her husband's family who had mentioned the circumstances in the hearing of a friend of mine, and one day something brought round the conversation to old times, and he startled me by suddenly inquiring if I remembered Maud Bertram. I said, of course I did. Did he know anything of her? And then he told me.

"She was dead—she had died some months ago after a long and trying illness, the result of a terrible accident. She had caught fire one evening when dressed for some grand entertainment or other, and though her injuries did not seem likely to be fatal at the time, she had never recovered the shock.

"'She was so pretty,' my friend said, 'and one of the saddest parts of it was that I hear she was terrifically disfigured, and she took this most sadly to heart. The right side of her face was utterly ruined, and the sight of the right eye lost, though, strange to say, the left side entirely escaped, and seeing her in profile one would have had no notion of what had happened. Was it not sad? She was such a sweet, bright creature.'

"I did not tell him my story, for I did not want it chattered about, but a strange sort of shiver ran through me at his words. It was the left side of her face only that the wraith of my poor friend had allowed me to see."

"Oh, Uncle Paul!" exclaimed Nina.

"And — as to the dates?" inquired Mr. Snowdon.

"I never knew the exact date of the accident," said Mr. Marischal, "but that of her death was fully six months after I had seen her. And in my own mind, I have never made any doubt that it was at or about, probably a short time after, the accident, that she came to me. It seemed a kind of appeal for sympathy—and—a farewell also, poor child."

They all sat silent for some little time, and then Mr. Marischal got up and went off to his own quarters, saying something vaguely about seeing if his letters had gone.

"What a touching story!" said Gladys Lloyd. "I am afraid, after all, it has been more painful than he realised for Mr. Marischal to tell it. Did you know anything of Maud's husband, dear Lady Denholme? Was he kind to her? Was she happy?"

"We never heard much about her married life," her hostess replied. "But I have no reason to think she was unhappy. Her husband married again two or three years after her death, but that says nothing."

"N—no," said Nina. "All the same, mamma, I am sure she really did love Uncle Paul very much,—much more than he had any idea of. Poor Maud!"

"And he has never married," added Gladys.

"No," said Lady Denholme, "but there have been many practical difficulties in the way of his doing so. He has had a most absorbingly busy life, and now that he is more at leisure he feels himself too old to form new ties."

"But," persisted Nina, "if he had had any idea at the time that Maud cared for him so?"

"Ah well," Lady Denholme allowed, "in that case, in spite of the practical difficulties, things would probably have been different."

And again Nina repeated softly, "Poor Maud!"

Saturday, August 3, 2019

Books are the carriers of civilization


“Books are the carriers of civilization. Without books, history is silent, literature dumb, science crippled, thought and speculation at a standstill. Without books, the development of civilization would have been impossible. They are engines of change (as the poet said), windows on the world and lighthouses erected in the sea of time. They are companions, teachers, magicians, bankers of the treasures of the mind. Books are humanity in print.
[Barbara Tuchman - Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Nov. 1980), pp. 16-32]”

“Books are the treasured wealth of the world and the fit inheritance of generations and nations. Books, the oldest and the best, stand naturally and rightfully on the shelves of every cottage. They have no cause of their own to plead, but while they enlighten and sustain the reader his common sense will not refuse them. Their authors are a natural and irresistible aristocracy in every society, and, more than kings or emperors, exert an influence on mankind.” ~Henry David Thoreau, Walden

“A room without books is like a body without a soul.” ~Marcus Tullius Cicero

“The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.” ~Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey

“Good friends, good books, and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life.” ~Mark Twain

“A great book should leave you with many experiences, and slightly exhausted at the end. You live several lives while reading.” ~William Styron, Conversations with William Styron

“Sometimes, you read a book and it fills you with this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the book.” ~John Green, The Fault in Our Stars

“There is no friend as loyal as a book.” ~Ernest Hemingway

“Only the very weak-minded refuse to be influenced by literature and poetry.” ~Cassandra Clare, Clockwork Angel

“Books are the quietest and most constant of friends; they are the most accessible and wisest of counselors, and the most patient of teachers.” ~Charles W. Eliot

“Some books should be tasted, some devoured, but only a few should be chewed and digested thoroughly.” ~Sir Francis Bacon

“Reader's Bill of Rights:

1. The right to not read

2. The right to skip pages

3. The right to not finish

4. The right to reread

5. The right to read anything

6. The right to escapism

7. The right to read anywhere

8. The right to browse

9. The right to read out loud

10. The right to not defend your tastes” ~Daniel Pennac